The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi campus investigation of academic dishonesty in higher education of Pakistan
Abstract
Purpose: The worst scandals of the world's top companies have turned the attention of researchers towards the function of academic institutions in ethical training of future business leaders because the issue of dishonest behaviour of students becomes very severe, when they exercise the same practice at their place of work. Therefore, the understanding of the factors that affect student's decisions to engage in academic dishonesty is important for academic institutions, in order to reduce its occurrence. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of individual factors, situational factors and ethical factors on academic dishonesty behaviour of students in Pakistan. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire‐based field survey was conducted with 500 students across four universities in Pakistan. Findings: It has been found that individual, situational and ethical factors affect on rationalisation of academic dishonesty and this rationalisation shapes actual conduct of academic dishonesty. Moreover, lack of well‐defined policies of the academic dishonesty in higher education is a major determinant of academic dishonesty among students. Practical implications: The results provide a strong implication for academics. By discouraging such behaviour, academic institutions can help ensure the integrity of the degrees they offer, and help to level the fair grade competition among students. Originality/value: The research provides a profound investigation of individual, situational and ethical factors as predictors of students’ academic dishonesty. The study is pioneering in its nature to explore two common forms of academic dishonesty, i.e. plagiarism and dual submission among university students. Furthermore, the study used rationalisation of academic dishonesty as a determinant of the actual act of academic dishonesty.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Academic dishonesty is a persistent and pervasive unethical behavior on college campuses in the world, including in the United States and the Republic of Korea [18][19][20].”
From Millennials’ Sleep and Unethical Behavior: Testing the Relationship between Sleep and Academic Dishonesty of Millennials in a Korean University (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534 · Cited by 1,955
Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and other Contextual Influences
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446 · Cited by 855
FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEATING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: A Review
Whitley, B. E. (1998) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1018724900565 · Cited by 782
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1014893102151 · Cited by 374
In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize
Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360701310805 · Cited by 268
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Abdolmohammadi, M.J. and Baker, C.R. (2007), “The relationship between moral reasoning and plagiarism in accounting courses: a replication study”, Issues in Accounting Education, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 45‐55. · DOI
- Akbulut, Y., Endag, S.S., Birinci, G.R., Kilic, K., Sahin, M.C. and OdabasI, F.H. (2008), “Exploring the types and reasons of internet‐triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: development of Internet‐Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS)”, Computers and Education, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 463‐473. · DOI
- Allmon, D.E., Page, D. and Roberts, R. (2000), “Determinants of perception of cheating: ethicalorientation, personality, and demographics”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 411‐422. · DOI
- Antion, D.L. and Michael, W.B. (1983), “Short‐term predictive validity of demographic, affective, personal, and cognitive variables in relation to two criterion measures of cheating behaviours”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 467‐482. · DOI
- Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
- Barnett, T., Bass, K. and Brown, G. (1996), “Religiosity, ethical ideology and intentions to report a peers wrongdoing”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 15 No. 11, pp. 1161‐1174. · DOI
- Beasley, J.D. (2004), “The impact of technology on plagiarism prevention and detection: research process automation, a new approach for prevention”, Proceedings of the Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policies 2004, Joint Information Systems Committee Plagiarism Advisory Service Conference, pp. 28‐30.
- Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P. and Morrison, J. (2006), “Using the business fraud triangle to predict academic dishonesty among business students”, Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 37‐54.
- Bertram Gallant, T. and Drinan, P. (2006), “Organizational theory and student cheating: explanations, responses and strategies”, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 77 No. 5, pp. 839‐860. · DOI
- Bolin, A.U. (2004), “Self‐control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty”, The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 138 No. 2, pp. 101‐114. · DOI · Paper page
- Brown, B.S. and Emmett, D. (2001), “Explaining variations in the level of academic dishonesty in studies of college students: some new evidence”, College Student Journal, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 529‐539.
- Clegg, S. and Flint, A. (2006), “More heat than light: plagiarism in its appearing”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 373‐387. · DOI
- Crown, D.F. and Spiller, M.S. (1998), “Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of the empirical research”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 683‐700.
- Darley, J. and Batson, C. (1973), “From Jerusalem to Jericho: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behaviour”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 27, pp. 100‐108. · DOI · Paper page
- Davis, S.F. and Ludvigson, H.W. (1995), “Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation”, Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 119‐122. · DOI
- Davy, J.A., Kincaid, J.F., Smith, K.J. and Trawick, M.A. (2007), “An examination of the role of attitudinal characteristics and motivation on the cheating behaviour of business students”, Ethics and Behaviour, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 257‐278. · DOI
- DeZoort, T. (1998), “Time pressure research in auditing: implications for practice”, The Auditors’ Report, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 11‐14.
- Ellahi, A. and Manarvi, I. (2010), “Understanding attitudes towards computer use in the police department of Pakistan”, The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 1‐26. · DOI
- Ferrell, O.C., Gresham, L.G. and Fraedrich, J. (1989), “A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing”, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 11, pp. 55‐64. · DOI
- Forsyth, D.R. and Nye, J.L. (1990), “Personal moral philosophies and moral choice”, Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 24, pp. 398‐414. · DOI
- Franklin Stokes, A. and Newstead, S. (1995), “Under graduate cheating: who does what and why?”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 159‐172. · DOI
- Genereux, R.L. and McLeod, B.A. (1995), “Circumstances surrounding cheating: a questionnaire study of college students”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 687‐704. · DOI
- Granitz, L. and Loewy, D. (2006), “Applying ethical theories: interpreting and responding to student plagiarism”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 72, pp. 293‐306. · DOI
- Guterman, L. (2008), “Celebrations and tough questions follow Harvard's move to open access”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 54 No. 25, p. A14.
- Kaufmann, J., West, T., Ravenscroft, S. and Shrader, B.C. (2005), “Ethical distancing: rationalising violations of organizational norms”, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 101‐134. · DOI
- Kerkvliet, J. (1994), “Cheating by economics students: a comparison of survey results”, Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 121‐133. · DOI
- Kibler, W.L. (1992), “A framework for addressing student academic dishonesty in higher education from a student development perspective”, PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, Lubbock, TX.
- Kisamore, J., Stone, T. and Jawahar, I. (2007), “Academic integrity: the relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 381‐394. · DOI
- Kline, T.J.B. (2005), Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation, Sage, Incorporated. · DOI · Paper page
- Kock, N.F. and Davison, R.M. (2003), “Dealing with plagiarism in the is research community: a look at factors that drive plagiarism and ways to address them”, Management Infor. Syst. Qtly, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 511‐532. · DOI
- Koh, H.P., Scully, G. and Woodliff, D.R. (2008), “The impact of cumulative pressure on accounting students propensity to commit plagiarism: an experimental approach”, Accounting & Finance, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 985‐1005. · DOI · Paper page
- Legault, L. and Green‐demers, I. (2006), “Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 98 No. 3, pp. 567‐582. · DOI
- Lewis, P.N. (2008), “Plagiarism antecedents and situational influence”, J&MC Quarterly, Vol. 85 No. 2, pp. 313‐330. · DOI
- McCabe, D.L. and Trevino, L.K. (1995), “Cheating among business students: a challenge for business leaders and educators”, Journal of Management Education, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 205‐218. · DOI
- McCabe, D.L. and Trevino, L.K. (1997), “Individual and contextual influences in academic dishonesty: a multicampus investigation”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 379‐396. · DOI · Paper page
- McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K. and Butterfield, K.D. (1999), “Academic integrity in honor code and nonhonor code environments: a qualitative investigation”, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 70 No. 2, pp. 211‐234. · DOI
- Macdonald R. and Carroll, J. (2006), “Plagiarism ‐ a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 233‐245. · DOI
- Miller, J.G. (1960), “Information input and overload and psychopathology”, American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 116, pp. 695‐704. · DOI
- Nazir, S.M. and Aslam, S.M. (2010), “Academic dishonesty and perceptions of Pakistani students”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 24 No. 7, pp. 655‐668. · DOI
- Nonis, S.A. and Swift, C.O. (1998), “Deterring cheating behaviour in the marketing classroom: an analysis of the effects of demographics, attitudes, and in‐class deterrent strategies”, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 188‐199. · DOI
- Nuss, E. (1984), “Academic integrity: comparing faculty and student attitudes”, Improving College Teaching, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 140‐144. · DOI
- Park, C. (2003), “In other (people's) words: plagiarism by university students ‐ literature and lessons”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 471‐488. · DOI
- Perry, A.R., Kane, K.M., Bernesser, K.J. and Spicker, P.T. (1990), “Type a behavior, competitive achievement‐striving and cheating among college students”, Psychological Reports, Vol. 66, pp. 459‐465. · DOI
- Ray, J.J. (1982), “Toward a definitive alienation scale”, Journal of Psychology, Vol. 112 No. 1, pp. 67‐70. · DOI
- Roig, M. and De Tommaso, L. (1995), “Are college student cheating and plagiarism related to academic procrastination?”, Psychological Reports, Vol. 77 No. 2, pp. 691‐698. · DOI
- Schab, F. (1991), “Schooling without learning: thirty years of cheating in high school”, Adolescence, Vol. 26 No. 104, pp. 839‐847.
- Schlenker, B.R. and Forsyth, D.R. (1977), “On the ethics of psychological research”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 37, pp. 225‐252.
- Selwyn, N. (2008), “‘Not necessarily a bad thing …’: a study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 465‐479. · DOI
- Seeman, M. (1991), “Alienation and Anomie”, in Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R. and Wrightsman, L.S. (Eds), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Vol. 1, Academic Press Inc San Diego, CA, pp. 291‐372. · DOI
- Sierra, J.J. and Hyman, R.M. (2008), “Ethical antecedents of cheating intentions: evidence of mediation”, Journal of Academic Ethics, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 51‐66. · DOI
- Simon, A.C., Carr, J.R., Deflyer, E., Mccullough, S., Morgan, S., Oleson, T. and Rassel., M. (2001), “On the evaluation of academic dishonesty: a survey of students and faculty at the university of Nevada, Reno”, IEEE, Frontiers in Education Conference, 31st Annual, Vol. 3, pp. F4A‐1.
- Singhapakdi, A. (2004), “Important factors underlying ethical intentions of students: implications for marketing education”, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 261‐270. · DOI
- Smith, K.J., Davy, A., Rosenberg, L.D. and Haight, T.G. (2002), “A structural modeling investigation of the influence of demographics and attitudinal factors and in class deterrents on cheating behaviour among accounting majors”, Journal of Accounting Education, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 45‐65. · DOI
- Solomon, I. and Brown, C. (1992), “Auditor's judgments and decisions under time pressure: an illustration and agenda for research”, Proceedings of the 1992 Deloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems, pp. 73‐98.
- Stone, R. (1996), “Alabama challenges fraud award”, Science, Vol. 272, p. 473. · DOI
- Susskind, A. (2006), “Cheat wave”, The Bulletin (Sydney), 24 October, pp. 30‐31.
- Tansey, R., Brown, G., Hyman, M.R. and Dawson, L.E. Jr (1994), “Personal moral philosophies and the moral judgments of salespeople”, The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 14, Winter, pp. 59‐75.
- Teixeira, A.A.C. and Rocha, M.F. (2008), “Academic cheating in Spain and Portugal: an empirical explanation”, International Journal of Iberian Studies, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 2‐22. · DOI
- Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., Briere, N.M., Senecal, C. and Vallieres, E.F. (1992), “The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 52, pp. 1003‐1017. · DOI
- Walton, C.L. (2010), “An investigation of academic dishonesty among undergraduates at Kansas State University”, Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
- Whitley, B.E. (1998), “Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 235‐274. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhao, L., Mao, H., Compton, B. J., Peng, J., Fu, G., Fang, F., Heyman, G. D., & Lee, K. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100455 · Cited by 120
El papel de la Tríada Oscura en la procrastinación académica y la deshonestidad académica
Hidalgo-Fuentes, S., Martínez-Álvarez, I., & Sospedra-Baeza, M. J. (2022) · Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento · doi:10.32348/1852.4206.v14.n3.32398 · Cited by 5
Ha, S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12093902 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellahi, A., Mushtaq, R., & Bashir Khan, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-08-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 647-666
- ISSN
- 0951-354X
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi campus investigation of academic dishonesty in higher education of Pakistan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijem-03-2012-0039
- The paper
- Ellahi, A., Mushtaq, R., & Bashir Khan, M. (2013). Multi campus investigation of academic dishonesty in higher education of Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-03-2012-0039