Cited by 5Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAcademic integrity and plagiarismPersonality Traits and Psychology

El papel de la Tríada Oscura en la procrastinación académica y la deshonestidad académica

Open access
Hidalgo-Fuentes, Sergio, Martínez-Álvarez, Isabel, Sospedra-Baeza, María Josefa·2022·Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento

Abstract

Este estudio investigó las relaciones entre la Tríada Oscura (maquiavelismo, narcisismo subclínico y psicopatía subclínica) y la procrastinación y deshonestidad académicas. Doscientos diez estudiantes universitarios españoles, con edades comprendidas entre los 18 y los 58 años, completaron las escalas Dirty Dozen, Academic Procrastination Scale-Short Form y una escala ad-hoc para evaluar la frecuencia de comportamientos académicos deshonestos. Se realizaron análisis de regresión jerárquica, controlando la edad y el sexo, se encontró que el maquiavelismo y el bajo narcisismo son predictores significativos de la procrastinación académica, mientras que el maquiavelismo es el único predictor significativo de la deshonestidad académica. El presente estudio contribuye a un mejor conocimiento de las causas de la procrastinación y la deshonestidad académicas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32348/1852.4206.v14.n3.32398

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals high in Machiavellianism are more likely to use ChatGPT covertly because they perceive questionable academic behaviors as less unethical than their peers.

    “individuals high in Machiavellianism-a manipulative trait linked to moral flexibility-are more likely to use ChatGPT covertly as they perceive questionable academic behaviors, such as cheating, as less unethical than their peers (de Winter et al., 2024;Elias, 2015;Hidalgo-Fuentes et al., 2022).”

    From Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students (2025) · cites this paper as Hidalgo-Fuentes et al., 2022

    The Abstract and Discussion (page not supplied) report that Machiavellianism predicted academic dishonesty among the Spanish university students studied, and the Discussion links the trait to manipulative strategies and an absence of guilt. The paper does not examine covert ChatGPT use or show that people high in Machiavellianism judge cheating less unethical than their peers; it cannot establish the proposed reason for ChatGPT use. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Carretero, H., & Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(3), 521-551.
  2. Elosua P. O. & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901.
  3. Hernández-Nieto, R. (2002). Contributions to statistical analysis. Mérida: Los Andes University Press
  4. Uzun, B., LeBlanc, S., & Ferrari, J. R. (2020). Relationship between Academic Procrastination and Self-Control: The Mediational Role of Self- Esteem. College Student Journal, 54(3), 309-316.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hidalgo-Fuentes, S., Martínez-Álvarez, I., & Sospedra-Baeza, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de València (ES)
  • Universidad a Distancia de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento
Published
2022-12-30
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
32-40
ISSN
1852-4206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320003968
Cited by
5
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento ( RACC ) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
Dark Triad, academic procrastination, academic dishonesty, Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, university students, Dirty Dozen, Academic Procrastination Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review