The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A production recovery plan in manufacturing supply chains for a high-demand item during COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: A recent global pandemic, known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), affects the manufacturing supply chains most significantly. This effect becomes more challenging for the manufacturers of high-demand and most essential items, such as toilet paper and hand sanitizer. In a pandemic situation, the demand of the essential products increases expressively; on the other hand, the supply of the raw materials decreases considerably with a constraint of production capacity. These dual disruptions impact the production process suddenly, and the process can collapse without immediate and necessary actions. To minimize the impacts of these dual disruptions, we aim to develop a recovery model for making a decision on the revised production plan. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, the authors use a mathematical modeling approach to develop a production recovery model for a high-demand and essential item during the COVID-19. The authors also analyze the properties of the recovery plan, and optimize the recovery plan to maximize the profit in the recovery window. Findings: The authors analyze the results using a numerical example. The result shows that the developed recovery model is capable of revising the production plan in the situations of both demand and supply disruptions, and improves the profit for the manufacturers. The authors also discuss the managerial implications, including the roles of digital technologies in the recovery process. Originality/value: This model, which is a novel contribution to the literature, will help decision-makers of high-demand and essential items to make an accurate and prompt decision in designing the revised production plan to recover during a pandemic, like COVID-19.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
Cited by
COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review
Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271 · Cited by 992
Self-citationIvanov, D. (2023) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892 · Cited by 833
Ivanov, D. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1890852 · Cited by 561
Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452 · Cited by 499
Impacts of COVID-19 on Global Supply Chains: Facts and Perspectives
Xu, Z., Elomri, A., Kerbache, L., & El Omri, A. (2020) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2020.3018420 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-06-19
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-125
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3036558031
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 94.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A production recovery plan in manufacturing supply chains for a high-demand item during COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijpdlm-04-2020-0127
- The paper
- Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P. (2021). A production recovery plan in manufacturing supply chains for a high-demand item during COVID-19. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-04-2020-0127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.