The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creating sustainable fresh food supply chains through waste reduction
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this empirical paper is to study information sharing in fresh food supply chains, with a specific goal of reducing waste and facilitating sustainable performance. The study focuses on material and information flow issues, specifically on sharing demand and shelf‐life data. Design/methodology/approach: This work has been designed as an exploratory case study in three fresh food supply chains, milk, fresh fish, and fresh poultry, in the Nordic countries. The cases are based on interviews and data from the databases of the companies involved. Each case focuses on analyzing information flow, particularly the current order patterns and forecasting and planning process, and material flow, focusing on the supply chain structure. In two cases significant changes have been made to forecasting processes and material flow, while the third case intends to identify the most beneficial uses of shared information to create a sustainable fresh food supply chain. Findings: The performance of the perishable food chain can be improved by more efficient information sharing. The key to improved operations is how and for which purposes the shared data should be used. In addition, changes in the supply chain structure were needed to speed up the deliveries and ensure shelf availability. The cross‐case analysis revealed that improved performance was obtained with parallel changes in information sharing and usage and in material flow. Originality/value: Few studies approach the problem of waste and sustainability from an integrated supply chain perspective. This paper links data sharing with the sustainability performance of the supply chain as a whole.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Overproduction of processed food, especially refrigerated foods with short shelf life, is one of the major causes of food waste [63,82].”
From Understanding Food Loss and Waste—Why Are We Losing and Wasting Food? (2019) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0126 · Cited by 3,197 · cited 2×
“A further rationale is that poor planning practices and delays in previous supply chain phases can harm the operations in later phases (Parfitt et al., 2010).”
BackgroundEstimating and Addressing America's Food Losses
Kantor, L. S., Lipton, K., Manchester, A., Oliveira, V., Kantor, L. S., Lipton, K., Manchester, A., & Oliveira, V. (1997) · Unknown · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.234453 · Cited by 491
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Ahumada, O. and Villalobos, J.R. (2009), “Application of planning models in the agri‐food supply chain: a review”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 196 No. 1, pp. 1‐20. · DOI
- Bowersox, D.J. and Daugherty, P.J. (1987), “Emerging patterns of logistical organization”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 46‐60.
- Cachon, G.P. and Fisher, M. (2000), “Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 8, pp. 1032‐1048. · DOI
- Chen, F. (1998), “Echelon reorder points, installation reorder points, and the value of centralized demand information”, Management Science, Vol. 44 No. 12, pp. 221‐234. · DOI
- Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532‐550. · DOI · Paper page
- Ellram, L.M., La Londe, B.J. and Weber, M.M. (1999), “Retail logistics”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 29 Nos 7/8, pp. 477‐494.
- Ettouzani, Y., Yates, N. and Mena, C. (2012), “Examining retail on shelf availability: promotional impact and a call for research”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 213‐243. · DOI
- Ferguson, M. and Ketzenberg, M. (2006), “Information sharing to improve retail product freshness of perishables”, Production & Operations Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 57‐73. · DOI
- Gavirneni, S. (2006), “Price fluctuations, information sharing, and supply chain performance”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 174 No. 3, pp. 1651‐1663. · DOI
- Gavirneni, S., Kapuscinski, R. and Tayur, S. (1999), “Value of information in capacitated supply chains”, Management Science, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 16‐24. · DOI
- Griffin, M., Sobal, J. and Lyson, T.A. (2008), “An analysis of a community food waste stream”, Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 26 Nos 1/2, pp. 67‐81. · DOI
- Kaipia, R. and Hartiala, H. (2006), “Information‐sharing in supply chains: five proposals on how to proceed”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 377‐393. · DOI
- Kaplan, R.S. (1998), “Innovation action research: creating new management theory and practice”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 89‐118.
- Kittipanya‐ngam, P., Shi, Y. and Gregory, M.J. (2010), “Food supply chain (FSC) in manufacturing companies – an exploratory study on product and configuration”, Proceedings of 17th EurOMA Conference, Porto, Portugal.
- Lee, H.L. and Whang, S. (2000), “Information sharing in a supply chain”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 20 Nos 3/4, pp. 373‐387. · DOI
- Lee, H.L., So, S.C. and Tang, C.S. (2000), “The value of information sharing in a two‐level supply chain”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 5, pp. 626‐643. · DOI
- Li, G., Lin, Y., Wang, S.Y. and Yan, H. (2006), “Enhancing agility by timely sharing of supply information”, Supply Chain Management – An International Journal, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 425‐435. · DOI
- Mena, C., Adenso‐Diaz, B. and Yurt, O. (2011), “The causes of food waste in the supplier‐retailer interface: evidences from the UK and Spain”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55 No. 6, pp. 648‐658. · DOI · Paper page
- Nereng, G., Semini, M., Romsdal, A. and Brekke, A. (2009), “Can innovations in the supply chain lead to reduction of GHG emissions from food products? A framework”, paper presented at Joint Actions on Climate Change Conference, Ålborg, Denmark.
- Taylor, D.H. and Fearne, A. (2009), “Demand management in fresh food value chains: a framework for analysis and improvement”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 379‐392. · DOI
- Thron, T., Nagy, G. and Wassan, N. (2007), “Evaluating alternative supply chain structures for perishable products”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 364‐384. · DOI
- Trienekens, J. and Zuurbier, P. (2008), “Quality and safety standards in the food industry, developments and challenges”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 113 No. 1, pp. 107‐122. · DOI
- Van Donk, P. (2001), “Make to stock or make to order: the decoupling point in the food processing industries”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 297‐306. · DOI
- Yu, Z., Yan, H. and Cheng, T.C.E. (2001), “Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 101 No. 3, pp. 114‐121. · DOI
- Zhao, X., Xie, J. and Zhang, W.J. (2002), “The impact of information sharing and ordering co‐ordination on supply chain performance”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 24‐40. · DOI
- Zhoua, H. and Benton, W.C. Jr (2007), “Supply chain practice and information sharing”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 1348‐1365. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.022 · Cited by 1,015
Parizeau, K., von Massow, M., & Martin, R. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.019 · Cited by 636
Understanding Food Loss and Waste—Why Are We Losing and Wasting Food?
Ishangulyyev, R., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2019) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods8080297 · Cited by 586
“Production Stage - Infrastructural limitation [2,21] - Over Production [2,43,63,64] - Harvesting timing [59,60] - Harvesting method (mechanical versus manual) [61,62] - Pesticides and fertilizers [67] - Economic problems [3] - Quality Standards [35,64–66] - Choice of variety [68]”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework
Govindan, K. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.003 · Cited by 539
Bortolini, M., Galizia, F. G., Mora, C., Botti, L., & Rosano, M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.231 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaipia, R., Dukovska‐Popovska, I., & Loikkanen, L.
- Affiliations
- Aalto University (FI)
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-04-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 262-276
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145036423
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11
- FWCI
- 26.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.aalto.fi
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management (publishedVersion)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
- Keywords
- fresh food supply chain, waste reduction, information sharing, perishable food, demand forecasting, material flow, supply chain structure, dairy supply chain, sustainability performance, Nordic countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
