The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the predictive power of social media
Abstract
Abstract Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consolidate existing knowledge and provide a deeper understanding of the use of social media (SM) data for predictions in various areas, such as disease outbreaks, product sales, stock market volatility and elections outcome predictions. Design/methodology/approach The scientific literature was systematically reviewed to identify relevant empirical studies. These studies were analysed and synthesized in the form of a proposed conceptual framework, which was thereafter applied to further analyse this literature, hence gaining new insights into the field. Findings The proposed framework reveals that all relevant studies can be decomposed into a small number of steps, and different approaches can be followed in each step. The application of the framework resulted in interesting findings. For example, most studies support SM predictive power, however, more than one-third of these studies infer predictive power without employing predictive analytics. In addition, analysis suggests that there is a clear need for more advanced sentiment analysis methods as well as methods for identifying search terms for collection and filtering of raw SM data. Originality/value The proposed framework enables researchers to classify and evaluate existing studies, to design scientifically rigorous new studies and to identify the field's weaknesses, hence proposing future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Twitter mood predicts the stock market
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007 · Cited by 5,206
Predicting the future with social media
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.63 · Cited by 2,081
Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1997) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/253769.253804 · Cited by 1,298
Predictive Analytics in Information Systems Research
Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. (2010) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1606674 · Cited by 676
Predicting consumer behavior with web search
Goel, S., Hofman, J. M., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005962107 · Cited by 636
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future
(2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017160.2017162 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Big data for development: a review of promises and challenges
Hilbert, M. (2016) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/dpr.12142 · Cited by 679
Chae, B. (. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.037 · Cited by 481
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03683-9 · Cited by 419
Arcila-Calderón, C., Amores, J. J., Sánchez-Holgado, P., & Blanco-Herrero, D. (2021) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti5100063 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K.
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-10-14
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 544-559
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984298344
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 24.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the predictive power of social media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/intr-06-2012-0114
- The paper
- Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2013). Understanding the predictive power of social media. Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-06-2012-0114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.