Cited by 37Elder Abuse and NeglectCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Older adults and “scams”: Evidence from the mass observation archive

Open access
Bailey, Jan, Taylor, Louise, Kingston, Paul, Watts, Geoffrey·2021·The Journal of Adult Protection

Abstract

Purpose The issue of financial abuse is highlighted in the Care Act (2014). One category of financial abuse is consumer fraud or “scams.” Evidence suggests that scams are becoming increasingly ubiquitous, yet how scams impact older adults remains under-researched. The purpose of this paper is to report data from 80 older adults’ written responses to a Mass Observation Archive Directive, commissioned in autumn 2015, which focused on scams. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was used with data captured via written responses to a set of questions. There was no limit on the length of written accounts, and respondents remained anonymous. Data were analysed thematically, resulting in four key themes. Findings The data indicated scams impact individuals in terms of health and well-being, irrespective of whether they have experienced financial loss, and trigger implementation of strategies intended to avoid being defrauded. There was also evidence of scam-related stigma with individuals who are defrauded being subject to derision and censure. Social implications Individuals who have been victimised by fraudsters may need access to practical and emotional support. This requires the design of appropriate interventions and the stigma associated with being scammed to be addressed. Originality/value This paper adopts an original approach to collecting rich, candid data about an under-researched topic. The authors highlight that anti-scam interventions should equip individuals to identify and avoid scams without inciting fear or anxiety; proposing this may be facilitated by drawing on health and safety risk assessment protocol when designing anti-scam interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jap-07-2020-0030

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey, J., Taylor, L., Kingston, P., & Watts, G.
Affiliations
University of Chester (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Adult Protection
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-01-06
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
57-69
ISSN
1466-8203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120338249
Cited by
37
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Adult Protection (publishedVersion)
  • ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
scams, consumer fraud, older adults, financial abuse, health and well-being, risk assessment, Care Act 2014, social support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review