Older adults and “scams”: Evidence from the mass observation archive
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The issue of financial abuse is highlighted in the Care Act (2014). One category of financial abuse is consumer fraud or “scams.” Evidence suggests that scams are becoming increasingly ubiquitous, yet how scams impact older adults remains under-researched. The purpose of this paper is to report data from 80 older adults’ written responses to a Mass Observation Archive Directive, commissioned in autumn 2015, which focused on scams. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was used with data captured via written responses to a set of questions. There was no limit on the length of written accounts, and respondents remained anonymous. Data were analysed thematically, resulting in four key themes. Findings The data indicated scams impact individuals in terms of health and well-being, irrespective of whether they have experienced financial loss, and trigger implementation of strategies intended to avoid being defrauded. There was also evidence of scam-related stigma with individuals who are defrauded being subject to derision and censure. Social implications Individuals who have been victimised by fraudsters may need access to practical and emotional support. This requires the design of appropriate interventions and the stigma associated with being scammed to be addressed. Originality/value This paper adopts an original approach to collecting rich, candid data about an under-researched topic. The authors highlight that anti-scam interventions should equip individuals to identify and avoid scams without inciting fear or anxiety; proposing this may be facilitated by drawing on health and safety risk assessment protocol when designing anti-scam interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
A psychological perspective on vulnerability in the fear of crime
Jackson, J. (2009) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683160802275797 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Vulnerability: Towards a Better Understanding of a Key Variable in the Genesis of Fear of Crime
Killias, M. (1990) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.5.2.97 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Introducing Fear of Crime to Risk Research
Jackson, J. (2006) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00715.x · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Fear of victimization and sensitivity to risk
Warr, M. (1987) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/bf01065199 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
No laughing matter: Blaming the victim of online fraud
Cross, C. (2015) · International Review of Victimology · doi:10.1177/0269758015571471 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Revisiting Risk Sensitivity in the Fear of Crime
Jackson, J. (2011) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427810395146 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Estimating the Economic and Social Costs of the Fear of Crime
Dolan, P., & Peasgood, T. (2006) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azl015 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
The psychology of scams: Provoking and committing errors of judgement
Lea, S. E. G., Fischer, P., & Evans, K. M. (2009) · Figshare · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Challenges of responding to online fraud victimisation in Australia
Cross, C., Smith, R., & Richards, K. (2014) · doi:10.52922/ti187564 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
ONS: Crime Survey for England and Wales
(2018) · Computer Fraud & Security · doi:10.1016/s1361-3723(18)30105-2 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Reviewing Mass-Observation: The Archive and its Researchers Thirty Years on
Sheridan, D. (2008) · Forum qualitative Sozialforschung · doi:10.17169/fqs-1.3.1043 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Gorden, C., & Buchanan, J. (2013) · The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1111/hojo.12036 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Olivier, S., Burls, T., Fenge, L., & Brown, K. (2016) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2016.1161872 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parti, K., & Tahir, F. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12050264 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Apart from financial loss, victims face other consequences, such as anxiety, depression, and chronic stress (Lichtenberg et al. 2013; Lichtenberg et al. 2016; DeLiema et al. 2020), which, in turn, negatively impact social relationships (Bailey et al. 2021).”
Fear of fraud amongst older adults: a hidden epidemic?
Button, M., Shepherd, D., Hawkins, C., & Tapley, J. (2025) · Security Journal · doi:10.1057/s41284-025-00485-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bailey, J., Taylor, L., Kingston, P., & Watts, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Chester (GB)
- ORCID
- Kingston, Paul
- Venue
- The Journal of Adult Protection
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-01-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-69
- ISSN
- 1466-8203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3120338249
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
- Locations
- The Journal of Adult Protection (publishedVersion)
- ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- scams, consumer fraud, older adults, financial abuse, health and well-being, risk assessment, Care Act 2014, social support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review