The impact of trust and commitment on value creation in asymmetric buyer–seller relationships: the mediation effect of specific asset investments
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies have argued that trust and commitment can create value in cooperative relationships. However, this study observed that, in practice, trust and commitment alone may not ensure value creation in asymmetric relationships. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the mediating role of specific assets in the effects of trust and commitment on value creation in asymmetric buyer–seller relationships. Design/methodology/approach Contract manufacturers (CMs) in Asia were sampled to validate the argument proposed by this study. Most Taiwanese CMs are partnered with international brands (original equipment manufacturers [OEMs]) that have stronger bargaining power. This cooperative relationship is characteristically asymmetric. A questionnaire method was applied, and structural equation modeling was performed to verify the proposed hypotheses. Findings Specific asset investment (SAI) was a crucial mediator that explained the effects of trust and commitment on the relationship value of an asymmetric cooperative relationship. Past studies have claimed that power asymmetry results in an unequal distribution of benefits. Nevertheless, regarding the relationship between CMs and OEMs, the study revealed that relationship value could still be increased once the congruent goals have been achieved by both parties. This finding contradicts past theoretical predictions. Practical implications Characteristically asymmetric CMs–OEMs (seller–buyer) relationships cannot be m…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Broader hospitality through staff conduct and trust in brand consistency meaningfully shape customer satisfaction.
“the broader hospitality extended through staff conduct, together with the trust customers place in a brand's consistency, has likewise been shown to meaningfully shape how satisfied a diner ultimately feels (Chen et al., 2017).”
From Restaurant Service Quality in Relation to Customer Satisfaction (2026) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2017
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151 · see citing works
SAFEGUARDING INVESTMENTS IN ASYMMETRIC INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE.
Subramani, M. R., & Venkatraman, N. (2003) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/30040675 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Restaurant Service Quality in Relation to Customer Satisfaction
Cabanday, F., & Estrosas, J. L. (2026) · The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.67167/vertex.656
“Finally, trust and commitment reflect the confidence customers place in a restaurant's consistency and the resulting willingness to maintain a relationship with the brand over repeated visits, rather than treating each visit as an isolated transaction (Chen et al., 2017).”
Influential
- Authors
- Chen, P.-Y., Chen, K.-Y., & Wu, L.-Y.
- Affiliations
- National Dong Hwa University (TW)
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science (TW)
- National Chengchi University (TW)
- Venue
- Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-04-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 457-471
- ISSN
- 0885-8624 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2603003935
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 17.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- trust, commitment, value creation, relationship value, contract manufacturing, original equipment manufacturers, power imbalance, value co-creation, relationship quality, mediating effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review