The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model
Abstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to integrate TAM model and TOE framework for cloud computing adoption at organizational level. Design/methodology/approach: – A conceptual framework was developed using technological and organizational variables of TOE framework as external variables of TAM model while environmental variables were proposed to have direct impact on cloud computing adoption. A questionnaire was used to collect the data from 280 companies in IT, manufacturing and finance sectors in India. The data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Further, structural equation modeling was used to test the proposed model. Findings: – The study identified relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, organizational readiness, top management commitment, and training and education as important variables for affecting cloud computing adoption using perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) as mediating variables. Also, competitive pressure and trading partner support were found directly affecting cloud computing adoption intentions. The model explained 62 percent of cloud computing adoption. Practical implications: – The model can be used as a guideline to ensure a positive outcome of the cloud computing adoption in organizations. It also provides relevant recommendations to achieve conducive implementation environment for cloud computing adoption. Originality/value: – This study integrates two of the information technology adoption models to improve predictive power of resulting model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487 · Cited by 1,440
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x · Cited by 1,409
Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption
Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571111161262 · Cited by 1,181
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses
Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00071-1 · Cited by 1,108
An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment
Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010 · Cited by 922
Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry
Wang, Y.-M., Wang, Y.-S., & Yang, Y.-F. (2010) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.006 · Cited by 912
Predicting SMEs' adoption of enterprise systems
Ramdani, B., Kawalek, P., & Lorenzo, O. (2009) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410390910922796 · Cited by 582
Cited by
Clohessy, T., & Acton, T. (2019) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-08-2018-0365 · Cited by 436
Khayer, A., Talukder, M. S., Bao, Y., & Hossain, M. N. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101225 · Cited by 308
Saif, N., Khan, S. U., Shaheen, I., ALotaibi, F. A., Alnfiai, M. M., & Arif, M. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097 · Cited by 301
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279
Shahadat, M. M. H., Nekmahmud, M., Ebrahimi, P., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2023) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/09721509221137199 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Gangwar, H., Date, H., & Ramaswamy, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Enterprise Information Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-02-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-130
- ISSN
- 1741-0398 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080053209
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 107.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jeim-08-2013-0065
- The paper
- Gangwar, H., Date, H., & Ramaswamy, R. (2015). Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-08-2013-0065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.