The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How MNC’s subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims at exploring the effect of knowledge management (KM) practices on the relationship between external research and development (R&D) and innovative performance. The authors argue that the firms which develop and possess superior KM capabilities have the ability to better manage external knowledge and combine it with the internal one. Design/methodology/approach: The authors used a sample of 117 European MNC subsidiaries. An OLS regression analysis was carried out to evaluate the moderator effect of KM on the relationship between external R&D and innovative performance. Findings: The authors found positive evidences in favor of a moderator effect of KM. This means that subsidiaries with superior KM capabilities are more effective in using external R&D, augmenting the magnitude of their external sources of knowledge and, consequently, improving their innovative performance. Practical implications: Managerially speaking, both corporate and subsidiaries’ managers need to understand the relevance of managing knowledge effectively and efficiently at the subsidiary level. Corporate managers need to allocate more resources (both financial and managerial) to the subsidiaries that are active in knowledge transfer and sharing, while subsidiaries managers need to implement practically the KM tools and processes at the subsidiary organizational level to improve subsidiary’s innovative performance. Originality/value: This paper contributes mainly to the KM field, highlighting the importance of KM at the subsidiary level, whereas most of previous studies focus on different units of analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · cited 1×
“Given that knowledge is an important competitive asset (Nonaka, 1994), KM capabilities and tools assist in acquiring, storing and using knowledge for tasks such as problem solving, dynamic learning, strategic planning and decision-making (Sveiby, 1997) that, in turn, improve creativity and…”
BackgroundLaursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth
Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.807 · Cited by 1,341
Cited by
Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., & Papa, A. (2020) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.003 · Cited by 363
Self-citationHameed, W. U., Nisar, Q. A., & Wu, H.-C. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102745 · Cited by 328
Cabrilo, S., & Dahms, S. (2018) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2017-0309 · Cited by 258
Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., & Pastore, A. (2017) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2017-0120 · Cited by 133
Self-citationInnovation within the food companies: how creative partnerships may conduct to better performances?
Ferraris, A., Vrontis, D., Belyaeva, Z., De Bernardi, P., & Ozek, H. (2020) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-07-2019-0502 · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Dezi, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-05-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 540-552
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2602977328
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 95.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How MNC’s subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jkm-09-2016-0411
- The paper
- Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., & Dezi, L. (2017). How MNC’s subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2016-0411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.