The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rescaling and refocusing smart cities research: from mega cities to smart villages
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to rethink the focus of the smart cities debate and to open it to policymaking and strategy considerations. To this end, the origins of what is termed normative bias in smart cities research are identified and a case made for a holistic, scalable and human-centred smart cities research agenda. Applicable across the micro, mezzo and macro levels of the context in which smart cities develop, this research agenda remains sensitive to the limitations and enablers inherent in these contexts. Policymaking and strategy consideration are incorporated in the agenda this paper advances, thus creating the prospect of bridging the normative and the empirical in smart cities research. Design/methodology/approach: This paper queries the smart cities debate and, by reference to megacities research, argues that the smart city remains an overly normatively laden concept frequently discussed in separation from the broader socio-political and economic contexts in which it is embedded. By focusing on what is termed the normative bias of smart cities research, this paper introduces the nested clusters model. By advocating the inclusion of policymaking and strategy considerations in the smart cities debate, a case is made for a holistic, scalable and human-centred smart cities agenda focused, on the one hand, on individuals and citizens inhabiting smart cities and, on the other hand, on interdependencies that unfold between a given smart city and the context in which it is embedded. Findings: This paper delineates the research focus and scope of the megacities and smart cities debates respectively. It locates the origins of normative bias inherent in smart cities research and, by making a case for holistic, scalable and human-centred smart cities research, suggests ways of bypassing that bias. It is argued that smart cities research has the potential of contributing to research on megacities (smart megacities and clusters), cities (smart cities) and villages (smart villages). The notions of policymaking and strategy, and ultimately of governance, are brought into the spotlight. Against this backdrop, it is argued that smart cities research needs to be based on real tangible experiences of individuals inhabiting rural and urban space and that it also needs to mirror and feed into policy-design and policymaking processes. Research limitations/implications: The paper stresses the need to explore the question of how the specific contexts in which cities/urban areas are located influence those cities/urban areas’ growth and development strategies. It also postulates new avenues of inter and multidisciplinary research geared toward building bridges between the normative and the empirical in the smart cities debate. More research is needed to advance these imperatives at the micro, mezzo and macro levels. Practical implications: By highlighting the connection, relatively under-represented in the literature, between the normative and the empirical in smart cities research, this paper encourages a more structured debate between academia and policymakers focused on the sustainable development of cities/urban areas. In doing so, it also advocates policies and strategies conducive to strengthening individuals’/citizens’ ability to benefit from and contribute to smart cities development, thereby making them sustainable. Social implications: This paper makes a case for pragmatic and demand-driven smart cities research, i.e. based on the frequently very basic needs of individuals and citizens inhabiting not only urban but also rural areas. It highlights the role of basic infrastructure as the key enabler/inhibitor of information and communication technology-enhanced services. The nested clusters model introduced in this paper suggests that an intimate connection exists between individuals’ well-being, their active civic engagement and smart cities sustainability. Originality/value: This paper delineates the relationship between megacities and smart cities research. It identifies the sources of what is termed normative bias in smart cities research. To address the implications of that bias, a nested clusters model for smart cities is introduced, i.e. a conceptual framework that allows us to redraw the debate on smart cities and establish a functional connection between the array of normatively laden ideas of what a smart city could be and what is feasible, and under which conditions at the policymaking level.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“owing to the disciplinary origins of ICT-oriented literature which resorts to what is labelled 'normative bias' of smart city research [135]”
From On the sustainability of smart and smarter cities in the era of big data: an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [135]
Citations
Cites
World Urbanization Prospects: The 1996 Revision
Brockerhoff, M. P., & Nations, U. (1998) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2808041 · Cited by 5,900
Clusters and the new economics of competition.
Porter, M. E. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 5,692
Clusters and the New Economics of Competition
Milošević, D. (2014) · Harvard business review · Cited by 4,857
Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/3.1.5 · Cited by 2,234
Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016 · Cited by 1,599
What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?
Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009 · Cited by 1,378
Smart city policies: A spatial approach
Angelidou, M. (2014) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007 · Cited by 986
Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces
Angelidou, M. (2015) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004 · Cited by 863
How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective
Kummitha, R. K. R., & Crutzen, N. (2017) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010 · Cited by 601
Zhou, C. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010114 · Cited by 477
Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases
Anthopoulos, L. G. (2016) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.005 · Cited by 365
The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword?
Godin, B. (2005) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-005-5010-x · Cited by 348
Khatoun, R., & Zeadally, S. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2858789 · Cited by 323
Praharaj, S., Han, J. H., & Hawken, S. (2017) · City Culture and Society · doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.06.004 · Cited by 215
Liefner, I. (2017) · International Encyclopedia of Geography · doi:10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0046 · Cited by 180
A Smart City Is a Collaborative Community
Snow, C. C., Håkonsson, D. D., & Obel, B. (2016) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125616683954 · Cited by 167
The next wave of innovation—Review of smart cities intelligent operation systems
Zhuhadar, L., Thrasher, E. H., Marklin, S., & de Pablos, P. O. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.030 · Cited by 160
Big Data and Data Analytics Research
Lytras, M. D., Raghavan, V. V., & Damiani, E. (2016) · International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems · doi:10.4018/ijswis.2017010101 · Cited by 156
Self-citationThe Metabolism of the Industrial City
Tarr, J. A. (2002) · Journal of Urban History · doi:10.1177/0096144202028005001 · Cited by 115
Big data dashboards as smart decision support tools for i-cities – An experiment on stockholm
Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. J. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.019 · Cited by 100
Irregular migratory flows: Towards an ICTs’ enabled integrated framework for resilient urban systems
Visvizi, A., Mazzucelli, C., & Lytras, M. (2017) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-05-2017-0020 · Cited by 84
Self-citationCreativity, clusters and the competitive advantage of cities
Martin, R., Florida, R. L., Pogue, M., & Mellander, C. (2015) · Competitiveness Review An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness · doi:10.1108/cr-07-2015-0069 · Cited by 77
Meerow, S. (2017) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x17723630 · Cited by 71
The OECD Metropolitan Governance Survey
Ahrend, R., Gamper, C., & Schumann, A. (2014) · OECD regional development working papers · doi:10.1787/5jz43zldh08p-en · Cited by 68
Spillovers from immigrant diversity in cities
Kemeny, T., & Cooke, A. M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx012 · Cited by 65
Global city clusters: theorizing spatial and non-spatial proximity in inter-urban firm networks
Martinus, K., & Sigler, T. (2017) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1314457 · Cited by 61
OECD (2015) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/9789264226500-en · Cited by 60
Big Sensed Data Meets Deep Learning for Smarter Health Care in Smart Cities
Obinikpo, A. A., & Kantarcı, B. (2017) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan6040026 · Cited by 59
A Better Way to Manage Customer Experience
Maklan, S., Antonetti, P., & Whitty, S. (2017) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125617695285 · Cited by 54
Global logistics city concept: a cluster-led strategy under the belt and road initiative
Chhetri, P., Nkhoma, M. Z., Peszynski, K. J., Chhetri, A., & Lee, P. T. (2017) · Maritime Policy & Management · doi:10.1080/03088839.2017.1400700 · Cited by 48
Determinants of Academic Startups’ Orientation toward International Business Expansion
Suzuki, S., & Okamuro, H. (2016) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci7010001 · Cited by 47
Industrial Clusters and CSR in Developing Countries: The Role of International Donor Funding
Fayyaz, A., Lund‐Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2940-6 · Cited by 38
Mueller, E. F., & Jungwirth, C. (2016) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985626.2016.1186748 · Cited by 36
Lytras, M. D., Damiani, E., & Mathkour, H. I. (2016) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1235815 · Cited by 33
Self-citationVallicelli, M. (2017) · City Culture and Society · doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.10.001 · Cited by 30
Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Zhou, M., & Yin, P. (2017) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Science · doi:10.1007/s13753-017-0149-2 · Cited by 20
The Contribution of Economic Sectors to Economic Growth: The Cases of Malaysia and China
Hussin, F., & Ching, C. W. (2013) · Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia) · Cited by 16
Eady, M. J., Woodcock, S., & Sisco, A. (2017) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2676 · Cited by 14
Advances in Research on Social Networking in Open and Distributed Learning
Stranack, K. (2017) · Cited by 14
Neitherordinarynorglobal: a reflection on the ‘extra-ordinary’ expansion of Athens
Salvati, L. (2014) · Urban Planning and Transport Research · doi:10.1080/21650020.2014.898571 · Cited by 13
Detter, H. (2015) · OPEC Energy Review · doi:10.1111/opec.12068 · Cited by 13
Tollin, N., Hamaber, J., & al, S. G. E. (2017) · Cited by 11
Stickiness and slipperiness in Istanbul’s old city jewellery cluster: a survival story
Evren, Y., & Ökten, A. N. (2016) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbw046 · Cited by 7
Cluster-based development: A Chinese cluster policy
Jankowiak, A. H. (2017) · Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu · doi:10.15611/pn.2017.486.06 · Cited by 5
Cyber Is the New Air: Domain Superiority in the Megacity
Commons, A. G. (2018) · Military review · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 2016, Megacities: setting the scene, Council on Tall Buildings & Urban Habitat (CTBUH) Journal
- 2018, Smart villages: concept, relevance, and policy responses, Sustainability, 10, 1
- 2016, Big data, big economic impact?, I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 10, 757
- 2017, Stickiness and slipperiness in Istanbul’s old city jewellery cluster: a survival story, Journal of Economic Geography, 17, 893
- 2017, Cluster activities in different institutional environments: case studies of ICT-clusters from Austria, Germany, Ukraine and Serbia, Administrative Sciences, 7, 1, 10.3390/admsci7020011 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research
Lytras, M. D., & Visvizi, A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061998 · Cited by 369
“At the same time, the ICT-oriented literature [9–11] frequently resorts to, what has been termed elsewhere as, the ‘normative bias’ of smart cities research [12].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBibri, S. E. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0182-7 · Cited by 278
“For example, owing to the disciplinary origins of ICT-oriented literature which resorts to what is labelled ‘normative bias’ of smart city research [135], and thus respective authors’ literacy in advanced sophisticated technologies, there is a fertile area of research that may challenge the promises and claims that ne…”
BackgroundChui, K. T., Lytras, M. D., & Visvizi, A. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11112869 · Cited by 270
“This new era defined by the imperative of energy sustainability requires dynamic real time distributed infrastructure and techniques to manage and utilize data flows from millions of devices (IoT), It also requires high speed networks that can bring together all stakeholders, including energy…”
BackgroundSelf-citationA Novel ICT Framework for Sustainable Development Goals
Kostoska, O., & Kocarev, L. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11071961 · Cited by 207
KUTTY, A. A. K. A., Abdella, G. M., Küçükvar, M., Onat, N. C., & Bulu, M. (2020) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2088 · Cited by 176
“Visvizi and Lytras (2018) highlight the importance of proper policy measures in transforming cities to be smarter and more sustainable.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Visvizi, A., & Lytras, M. D.
- Affiliations
- The American College of Greece (GR)
- Venue
- Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-05-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-145
- ISSN
- 2053-4620 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2805837290
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 30.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
- Keywords
- smart cities, normative bias, smart village, urban governance, policy making, research agenda, urban development strategy, rural-urban interdependence, scale of analysis, multidisciplinary research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review