Cited by 110AI and HR TechnologiesHuman Resource and Talent ManagementEmployer Branding and e-HRM

The HR analytics cycle: a seven-step process for building evidence-based and ethical HR analytics capabilities

Open access
Falletta, Salvatore V., Combs, Wendy L.·2021·Journal of Work-Applied Management

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the paper is to explore the meaning of Human Resources (HR) analytics and introduce the HR analytics cycle as a proactive and systematic process for ethically gathering, analyzing, communicating and using evidence-based HR research and analytical insights to help organizations achieve their strategic objectives. Design/methodology/approach Conceptual review of the current state and meaning of HR analytics. Using the HR analytics cycle as a framework, the authors describe a seven-step process for building evidence-based and ethical HR analytics capabilities. Findings HR analytics is a nascent discipline and there are a multitude of monikers and competing definitions. With few exceptions, these definitions lack emphasis on evidence-based practice (i.e. the use of scientific research findings in adopting HR practices), ethical practice (i.e. ethically gathering and using HR data and insights) and the role of broader HR research and experimentation. More importantly, there are no practical models or frameworks available to help guide HR leaders and practitioners in doing HR analytics work. Practical implications The HR analytics cycle encompasses a broader range of HR analytics practices and data sources including HR research and experimentation in the context of social, behavioral and organizational science. Originality/value This paper introduces the HR analytics cycle as a practical seven-step approach for making HR analytics work in organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jwam-03-2020-0020

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HR analytics is its own stand-alone practice, meaning no available alternatives or substitutes can gain similar insights.

    “Finally, HR analytics is its own stand-alone practice, meaning no available alternatives or substitutes can gain similar insights (Falletta and Combs, 2020).”

    From Bridging the gap: why, how and when HR analytics can impact organizational performance (2022) · cites this paper as Falletta and Combs, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falletta, S. V., & Combs, W. L.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Falletta, Salvatore V.
Venue
Journal of Work-Applied Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-07-14
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
51-68
ISSN
  • 2205-149X (ISSN-L)
  • 2205-2062
OpenAlex
W3043109987
Cited by
110
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Work-Applied Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
HR analytics, evidence-based practice, data ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review