Cited by 179AI and HR TechnologiesHuman Resource and Talent ManagementEmployer Branding and e-HRM

The science and practice of workforce analytics: Introduction to the HRM special issue

Huselid, Mark A.·2018·Human Resource Management

Abstract

This special issue of Human Resource Management is focused on the latest thinking, research, and practical advances in the emerging field of Workforce Analytics . The eight diverse papers in this issue present new theoretical developments, methodological and statistical tools, and examples of innovative workforce analytics in practice. Taken as a whole, the findings show that workforce analytics can significantly enhance the ability of leaders and managers to achieve their operational and strategic objectives through more effective workforce management. But capitalizing on these opportunities will require both HR and line managers to develop a comprehensive understanding of how the workforce contributes to their firm's strategic success—and this understanding must be reflected in the workforce metrics and analytics they develop and deploy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hrm.21916

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research investigating how and to what extent HR analytics impacts and influences organizational performance remains scarce.

    “Despite the advancement of HR analytics literature and the number of case studies claiming that HR analytics allows organizations to improve their performance (Marler and Boudreau, 2017;Fernandez and Gallardo-Gallardo, 2020;Margherita, 2020), research investigating how and to what extent HR analytics impacts and influences organizational performance remains scarce (Huselid, 2018;Minbaeva, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huselid, M. A.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Huselid, Mark A.
Venue
Human Resource Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
679-684
ISSN
  • 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-050X
OpenAlex
W2803010576
Cited by
179
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
17.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
workforce analytics, workforce management, HR analytics, strategic human resource management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review