Cited by 41AI and HR TechnologiesBig Data and Business IntelligenceHuman Resource and Talent Management

Exploring the phenomenon of HR analytics: A study of challenges, risks and impacts in 40 large companies

Cayrat, Charles, Boxall, Peter·2022·Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to respond to questions being raised about the challenges, risks and impacts of Human Resource Analytics (HRA). Based on a study of 40 companies, it discusses the implications of HRA for practitioners, praxis and practices in HRM and adds to this a concern with whether HRA is enhancing mutuality in employment relationships. Design/methodology/approach Using an abductive approach, the authors analyzed data from semistructured interviews with an HRA leader or specialist in 40 large organizations. Findings While wrestling with the challenge of data quality and integration, the practice of descriptive analytics is widely adopted in these companies and the majority can demonstrate improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of HR activities through predictive analytics. The analytical competence of HR specialists is an ongoing issue. While much more research is needed, the companies in the authors’ sample demonstrated some valuable examples of mutual gains from HRA. Practical implications Education in HRA must not only help to raise quantitative competencies among HR specialists but should also help them to ask critical questions about the theoretical propositions and subjective data points being built into HRA. Boundary spanning is important to enable effective HRA and processes for employee voice to be improved. Arguably, the time has come for a more formalized data analytics' strategy in large organizations. Originality/value This paper provides evidence on how HRA is being implemented in large companies, including how HRA leaders are managing its challenges and risks and the impacts it is having on business and employee outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/joepp-08-2021-0238

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing literature often frames people analytics value creation through an inside-out lens, emphasizing how people analytics can optimize workforce processes and improve organizational performance through data-driven decision-making.

    “Existing literature often frames people analytics value creation through an inside-out lens, emphasizing how people analytics can optimize workforce processes and improve organizational performance through data-driven decision-making.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cayrat, C., & Boxall, P.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2022-07-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
572-590
ISSN
2051-6614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4284988378
Cited by
41
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
HR analytics, predictive analytics, descriptive analytics, data quality, data integration, HR professionals, analytics strategy, employee voice, boundary spanning, large organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review