The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Factors impacting end-users' usage of ERP in China
Abstract
Purpose: – This paper aims to examine the influence of organizational support, subjective norm and output quality on end-users' usage of enterprise resource planning (ERP) in China. Design/methodology/approach: – A conceptual framework is formed based on technology acceptance model literature. Data were collected through a survey on 127 ERP users in small- to middle-sized Chinese firms. Multiple regression analysis was employed. Findings: – Subjective norm and output quality determine the perceived usefulness of ERP. Communication has a significant impact on both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of the use of ERP, which further influence ERP usage. Research limitations/implications: – Future research should consider the adoption of different kinds of ERP systems in other countries. Practical implications: – The findings may help organizations effectively use ERP and other kinds of technology systems. In particular, efficient training should be a focus of organizational support in systems implementation. Originality/value: – This study focuses on the impact of organizational training and output quality on end-users' usage of ERP in China.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, when the use of a system is mandatory, studies find that social influence element has a significant impact on the actual use of the information technology (Amron et al., 2019; Mensah, 2019); (Zhang et al., 2013).”
From ERP Post-Implementation Phase: Deployment of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model on User Acceptance (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2013
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Behrend, T.S. , Wiebe, E.N. , London, J.E. and Johnson, E.C. (2010), “Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 231-240. · DOI
- Choi, J. and Geistfeld, L.V. (2004), “A cross-cultural investigation of consumer e-shopping adoption”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 821-838. · DOI · Paper page
- Dery, K. , Grant, D. , Harley, B. and Wright, C. (2006), “Work, organization and enterprise resource planning systems: an alternative research agenda”, New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 199-214. · DOI
- Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1999), “Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs”, Information & Management, Vol. 36, pp. 9-21. · DOI · Paper page
- Ge, Z. and Gao, P. (2008), “Studies on traffic effects of high-speed ring road in city center”, Kybernetes, Vol. 37 Nos 9/10, pp. 1315-1321. · DOI
- Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994), “Explaining the role of user participation in information system use”, Management Science, Vol. 40, pp. 440-465. · DOI · Paper page
- Helm, S.A. , Hall, M.L.L. and Hall, C.A.L. (2003), “Pre-implementation attitudes and organizational readiness for implementing an enterprise resource planning system”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 146, pp. 258-273. · DOI
- Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W. (1999), “The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use”, Information & Management, Vol. 35, pp. 237-250. · DOI
- Kerimoglu, O. , Basoglu, N. and Daim, T. (2008), “Organizational adoption of information technologies: case of enterprise resource planning systems”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 19, pp. 21-35. · DOI
- Lee, D. , Lee, S.M. and Olson, D.L. (2010), “The effect of organizational support on ERP implementation”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 110 No. 2, pp. 269-283. · DOI
- Martinsons, M.G. and Hempel, P.S. (1998), “Chinese business process re-engineering”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 393-407. · DOI
- Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001), “Extending the TAM for a world-wide web context”, Information & Management, Vol. 26, pp. 201-215. · DOI · Paper page
- Nah, F.F. , Tan, X. and Teh, S.H. (2004), “An empirical investigation on end-users' acceptance of enterprise systems”, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 32-53. · DOI
- Pallant, J. (2010), SPSS: Survival Manual, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
- Peslak, A. , Suramanian, G. and Clayton, G. (2007), “The phases of ERP software implementation and maintenance: a model for predicting preferred ERP use”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 25-33.
- Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M. (2007), “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects”, Information & Management, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 90-103. · DOI
- Schlichter, B.R. and Kraemmergaard, P. (2010), “A comprehensive literature review of the ERP research field over a decade”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 486-520. · DOI
- Sharma, R. and Yetton, P. (2007), “The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, pp. 219-238. · DOI · Paper page
- Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007), Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed., Pearson Education, Boston, MA.
- Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. (1995), “Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 144-176. · DOI · Paper page
- Thompson, R.L. , Higgins, C.A. and Howell, J.M. (1991), “Personal computing toward a conceptual model of utilization”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 125-143. · DOI · Paper page
- Umble, E.J. and Umble, M.M. (2002), “Avoiding ERP implementation failure”, Industrial Management, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 25-33.
- Venkatesh, V. , Morris, M.G. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 425-478. · DOI · Paper page
- Yusuf, Y. , Gunasekaran, A. and Abthorpe, M.K. (2004), “Enterprise information systems project implementation: a case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 87, pp. 251-266. · DOI
- Zhang, Z. , Lee, M.K.O. , Huang, P. , Zhang, L. and Huang, X. (2005), “A framework of ERP systems implementation success in China: an empirical study”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 98, pp. 56-80. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Gao, P., & Ge, Z.
- Affiliations
- Shanxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- ORCID
- Gao, Ping
- Venue
- Kybernetes
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-09-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1029-1043
- ISSN
- 0368-492X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1582532569
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Kybernetes (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, ERP adoption, technology acceptance model, organizational support, subjective norms, output quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, employee training, small and medium-sized enterprises, China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors impacting end-users' usage of ERP in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/k-11-2012-0099
- The paper
- Zhang, S., Gao, P., & Ge, Z. (2013). Factors impacting end-users' usage of ERP in China. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-11-2012-0099