The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost
Abstract
Purpose: – The mechanical properties and surface finish of functional parts are important consideration in rapid prototyping, and the selection of proper parameters is essential to improve manufacturing solutions. The purpose of this paper is to describe how parts manufactured by fused deposition modelling (FDM), with different part orientations and raster angles, were examined experimentally and evaluated to achieve the desired properties of the parts while shortening the manufacturing times due to maintenance costs. Design/methodology/approach: – For this purpose, five different raster angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°) for three part orientations (horizontal, vertical and perpendicular) have been manufactured by the FDM method and tested for surface roughness, tensile strength and flexural strength. Also, behaviour of the mechanical properties was clarified with scanning electron microscopy images of fracture surfaces. Findings: – The research results suggest that the orientation has a more significant influence than the raster angle on the surface roughness and mechanical behaviour of the resulting fused deposition part. The results indicate that there is close relationship between the surface roughness and the mechanical properties. Originality/value: – The results of this paper are useful in defining the most appropriate raster angle and part orientation in minimum production cost for FDM components on the basis of their expected in-service loading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R. (2018) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 · Cited by 1,015
Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
Rajan, K., Samykano, M., Kadirgama, K., Harun, W. S. W., & Rahman, M. M. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 · Cited by 426
Rashed, K., Kafi, A., Simons, R., & Bateman, S. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-10134-1 · Cited by 39
Rashed, K., Kafi, A., Simons, R., & Bateman, S. (2023) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-023-11167-w · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Durgun, I., & Ertan, R.
- Venue
- Rapid Prototyping Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2014-04-14
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 228-235
- ISSN
- 1355-2546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142615681
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/rpj-10-2012-0091
- The paper
- Durgun, I., & Ertan, R. (2014). Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyping Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-10-2012-0091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.