Cited by 17Social Media and PoliticsCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare StudiesFreedom of Expression and Defamation

The dynamics of backlash online: Anonymous and the Battle for WikiLeaks

Earl, Jennifer, Beyer, Jessica L.·2014·Intersectionality and Social Change

Abstract

We analyze reactions to the U.S. government-led repression of WikiLeaks in late 2010 by actors such as Anonymous and the Pirate Parties to argue that the potential for backlash, which has been so prominent offline, is also a potential repercussion of repression online. In doing so, we use existing research to identify different ways in which bystanders might be pulled into conflicts, and examine our case for evidence of any of these forms of backlash. We also hypothesize that the net observed effect of repression is really the result of competing and/or amplifying backlash and deterrence effects; when this net effect is in favor of backlash, we call it a “net backlash effect” to indicate that there was more backlash than deterrence. We argue that net backlash occurs when repression recruits more bystanders into a conflict than it is able to deter in terms of already active participants. We also argue that backlash is a very likely outcome when Internet activism is repressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/s0163-786x20140000037007

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When information control strategies are used, this may draw other digitally active individuals and groups into protest, representing a backfire effect.

    “Likewise, some have argued that when information control strategies are used, this may draw other digitally active individuals and groups into protest (141, 184), representing a backfire effect.”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [141]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Earl, J., & Beyer, J. L.
Venue
Intersectionality and Social Change
Published
2014-09-17
Pages
207-233
OpenAlex
W2499112049
Cited by
17
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.02
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Keywords
WikiLeaks, Anonymous (hacktivist collective), Pirate Party, backlash, deterrence, bystanders, digital activism, political mobilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review