The dynamics of backlash online: Anonymous and the Battle for WikiLeaks
Abstract
We analyze reactions to the U.S. government-led repression of WikiLeaks in late 2010 by actors such as Anonymous and the Pirate Parties to argue that the potential for backlash, which has been so prominent offline, is also a potential repercussion of repression online. In doing so, we use existing research to identify different ways in which bystanders might be pulled into conflicts, and examine our case for evidence of any of these forms of backlash. We also hypothesize that the net observed effect of repression is really the result of competing and/or amplifying backlash and deterrence effects; when this net effect is in favor of backlash, we call it a “net backlash effect” to indicate that there was more backlash than deterrence. We argue that net backlash occurs when repression recruits more bystanders into a conflict than it is able to deter in terms of already active participants. We also argue that backlash is a very likely outcome when Internet activism is repressed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When information control strategies are used, this may draw other digitally active individuals and groups into protest, representing a backfire effect.
“Likewise, some have argued that when information control strategies are used, this may draw other digitally active individuals and groups into protest (141, 184), representing a backfire effect.”
From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [141]
Cites
State Repression and Political Order
Davenport, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216 · Cited by 1,564 · see citing works
Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control
Earl, J. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102609 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Self-citationOpportunity Organizations and Threat‐Induced Contention: Protest Waves in Authoritarian Settings
Almeida, P. D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/378395 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Dynamics of Repression and Mobilization: The German Extreme Right in The 1990s
Koopmans, R. (1997) · Mobilization: An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/maiq.2.2.e6g82877674x6048 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Earl, J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8198 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Self-citationEarl, J. (2018) · The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements · doi:10.1002/9781119168577.ch16 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Earl, J., & Beyer, J. L.
- Venue
- Intersectionality and Social Change
- Publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2014-09-17
- Pages
- 207-233
- OpenAlex
- W2499112049
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
- Keywords
- WikiLeaks, Anonymous (hacktivist collective), Pirate Party, backlash, deterrence, bystanders, digital activism, political mobilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review