Cited by 60Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Coil design for real and sham transcranial magnetic stimulation

Ruohonen, J., Ollikainen, M., Nikouline, V., Virtanen, J., Ilmoniemi, R.J.·2000·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to excite the human cortex noninvasively. TMS also activates scalp muscles and sensory receptors; additionally, the loud sound from the stimulating coil activates auditory pathways. These side effects complicate the interpretation of the results of TMS studies. For control experiments, we have designed a coil that can produce both real and sham stimulation without moving the coil. The sham TMS is similar to the real TMS, except for the different relative direction of the currents in the two loops of the figure-of-eight coil. While the real TMS elicited activation of hand muscles, sham TMS had no such effect; however, the auditory-evoked potentials were similar.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/10.821731

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TMS-induced electric fields are estimated to be in the range of 50 to 130 mV/mm and 20-150 mV/mm, which are in the range of local field potentials and may be the driver of TMS effects.

    “TMS-induced electric fields (orthogonal to the magnetic field induced by coils) cannot be measured directly but, from modelling studies, are estimated to be in the range of 50 to 130 mV/mm [65] and 20-150 mV/mm [66], which are in the range of local field potentials (LFPs) measured with external electrodes (see below) so may be the driver of TMS effects.”

    From The electromagnetic will (2021) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruohonen, J., Ollikainen, M., Nikouline, V., Virtanen, J., & Ilmoniemi, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2000
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
145-148
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127067946
Cited by
60
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, sham stimulation, coil design, figure-of-eight coil, auditory evoked potentials, control experiments
MeSH terms
Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Equipment Design, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Physical Stimulation, Reference Values, Muscle, Skeletal, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review