Cited by 210Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Echoplanar BOLD fMRI of brain activation induced by concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation

BOHNING, DARYL E., SHASTRI, ANANDA, NAHAS, ZIAD, LORBERBAUM, JEFF P., ANDERSEN, STIG W., DANNELS, WAYNE R., HAXTHAUSEN, ERNST-U, VINCENT, DIANA J. +1 more·1998·Investigative Radiology

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors demonstrate the feasibility of combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) inside an MR scanner to noninvasively stimulate and image regional brain activity. METHODS: Echoplanar blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD)-based fMRI studies of TMS response were performed on three human volunteers inside a standard 1.5 T MR scanner using independent computer control to interleave echoplanar image acquisition and stimulation of right thumb primary motor cortex with a nonferromagnetic TMS coil. RESULTS: Significant (P< 0.001) response was observed in motor cortex under the TMS coil during stimulation compared to rest, as well in auditory cortex, the latter presumably due to the loud "snap" when the coil was pulsed. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent TMS stimulation and echoplanar BOLD fMRI imaging is possible. This method has potential for tracing neural circuits with brain imaging, as well as investigating the effects of TMS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004424-199806000-00004

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BOHNING, D. E., SHASTRI, A., NAHAS, Z., LORBERBAUM, J. P., ANDERSEN, S. W., DANNELS, W. R., HAXTHAUSEN, E.-U., VINCENT, D. J., & GEORGE, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Cybernetica (Norway) (NO)
Corresponding author
  • BOHNING, DARYL E.
  • SHASTRI, ANANDA
  • VINCENT, DIANA J.
  • GEORGE, MARK S.
Venue
Investigative Radiology
Published
1998-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
336-340
ISSN
0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075170823
Cited by
210
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Investigative Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, BOLD fMRI, echo planar imaging, primary motor cortex, auditory cortex, neural circuit tracing, brain activation
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Electromagnetic Fields, Hand, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Cortex, Noise, Physical Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review