The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG complexity as a measure of depth of anesthesia for patients
Abstract
A new approach for quantifying the relationship between brain activity patterns and depth of anesthesia (DOA) is presented by analyzing the spatio-temporal patterns in the electroencephalogram (EEG) using Lempel-Ziv complexity analysis. Twenty-seven patients undergoing vascular surgery were studied under general anesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane, propofol, or desflurane. The EEG was recorded continuously during the procedure and patients' anesthesia states were assessed according to the responsiveness component of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) score. An OAA/S score of zero or one was considered asleep and two or greater was considered awake. Complexity of the EEG was quantitatively estimated by the measure C(n), whose performance in discriminating awake and asleep states was analyzed by statistics for different anesthetic techniques and different patient populations. Compared with other measures, such as approximate entropy, spectral entropy, and median frequency, C(n) not only demonstrates better performance (93% accuracy) across all of the patients, but also is an easier algorithm to implement for real-time use. The study shows that C(n) is a very useful and promising EEG-derived parameter for characterizing the (DOA) under clinical situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity.
Pincus, S. M. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.6.2297 · Cited by 5,811
Tononi, G. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5395.1846 · Cited by 1,561
A complexity measure for selective matching of signals by the brain.
Tononi, G., Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.8.3422 · Cited by 191
Cited by
The entropic brain - revisited
Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2018) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.03.010 · Cited by 522
Approximate Entropy as a diagnostic tool for machine health monitoring
Yan, R., & Gao, R. X. (2007) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.02.009 · Cited by 454
Depression biomarkers using non-invasive EEG: A review
de Aguiar Neto, F. S., & Rosa, J. L. G. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.021 · Cited by 451
Increased spontaneous MEG signal diversity for psychoactive doses of ketamine, LSD and psilocybin
Schartner, M. M., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Barrett, A. B., Seth, A. K., & Muthukumaraswamy, S. D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46421 · Cited by 410
Schartner, M., Seth, A., Noirhomme, Q., Boly, M., Bruno, M.-A., Laureys, S., & Barrett, A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133532 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X.-S., Roy, R. J., & Jensen, E. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1424-1433
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137478377
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EEG complexity as a measure of depth of anesthesia for patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.966601
- The paper
- Zhang, X.-S., Roy, R. J., & Jensen, E. W. (2001). EEG complexity as a measure of depth of anesthesia for patients. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.966601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.