The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unconditionally secure key agreement and the intrinsic conditional information
Abstract
This paper is concerned with secret-key agreement by public discussion. Assume that two parties Alice and Bob and an adversary Eve have access to independent realizations of random variables X, Y, and Z, respectively, with joint distribution P/sub XYZ/. The secret-key rate S(X;Y/spl par/Z) has been defined as the maximal rate at which Alice and Bob can generate a secret key by communication over an insecure, but authenticated channel such that Eve's information about this key is arbitrarily small. We define a new conditional mutual information measure, the intrinsic conditional mutual information between S and Y when given Z, denoted by I(X;Y/spl darr/Z), which is an upper bound on S(X;Y/spl par/Z). The special scenarios are analyzed where X, Y, and Z are generated by sending a binary random variable R, for example a signal broadcast by a satellite, over independent channels, or two scenarios in which Z is generated by sending X and Y over erasure channels. In the first two scenarios it can be shown that the secret-key rate is strictly positive if and only if I(X;Y/spl darr/Z) is strictly positive. For the third scenario, a new protocol is presented which allows secret-key agreement even when all the previously known protocols fail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems
Shannon, C. E. (1949) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb00928.x · Cited by 9,440 · cited 7×
“In [13] this pessimism has been relativized by pointing out that Shannon’s apparently innocent assumption that, except for the secret key, the opponent has access to precisely the same information as the legitimate receiver, is very restrictive and that indeed in many practical scenarios, especially if one considers t…”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
Lounis, B., & Orrit, M. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/5/r04 · Cited by 908
From Bell’s Theorem to Secure Quantum Key Distribution
Acín, A., Gisin, N., & Masanes, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.120405 · Cited by 709
Proof of security of quantum key distribution with two-way classical communications
Gottesman, D., & Lo, H.-K. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2002.807289 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Maurer, U. M., & Wolf, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 499-514
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110358873
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unconditionally secure key agreement and the intrinsic conditional information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.748999
- The paper
- Maurer, U. M., & Wolf, S. (1999). Unconditionally secure key agreement and the intrinsic conditional information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.748999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.