Cited by 670Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information

Pluim, J.P.W., Maintz, J.B.A., Viergever, M.A.·2000·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Mutual information has developed into an accurate measure for rigid and affine monomodality and multimodality image registration. The robustness of the measure is questionable, however. A possible reason for this is the absence of spatial information in the measure. The present paper proposes to include spatial information by combining mutual information with a term based on the image gradient of the images to be registered. The gradient term not only seeks to align locations of high gradient magnitude, but also aims for a similar orientation of the gradients at these locations. Results of combining both standard mutual information as well as a normalized measure are presented for rigid registration of three-dimensional clinical images [magnetic resonance (MR), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET)]. The results indicate that the combined measures yield a better registration function does mutual information or normalized mutual information per se. The registration functions are less sensitive to low sampling resolution, do not contain incorrect global maxima that are sometimes found in the mutual information function, and interpolation-induced local minima can be reduced. These characteristics yield the promise of more robust registration measures. The accuracy of the combined measures is similar to that of mutual information-based methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/42.876307

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pluim, J. P. W., Maintz, J. B. A., & Viergever, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2000
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
809-814
ISSN
0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136503713
Cited by
670
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 45
FWCI
21.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns033926-02)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R01 NS 33926-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
image registration, mutual information, gradient information, normalized mutual information, rigid registration, multimodal image registration, gradient direction, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, positron emission tomography
MeSH terms
Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Probability, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Entropy, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review