Cited by 215Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDigital Image Processing Techniques3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Automated graph-based analysis and correction of cortical volume topology

Shattuck, D.W., Leahy, R.M.·2001·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

The human cerebral cortex is topologically equivalent to a sheet and can be considered topologically spherical if it is closed at the brain stem. Low-level segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) imagery typically produces cerebral volumes whose tessellations are not topologically spherical. We present a novel algorithm that analyzes and constrains the topology of a volumetric object. Graphs are formed that represent the connectivity of voxel segments in the foreground and background of the image. These graphs are analyzed and minimal corrections to the volume are made prior to tessellation. We apply the algorithm to a simple test object and to cerebral white matter masks generated by a low-level tissue identification sequence. We tessellate the resulting objects using the marching cubes algorithm and verify their topology by computing their Euler characteristics. A key benefit of the algorithm is that it localizes the change to a volume to the specific areas of its topological defects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/42.963819

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An extensively validated tissue classifier generated detailed maps of GM, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid.

    “An extensively validated tissue classifier generated detailed maps of GM, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid by using a Gaussian mixture distribution to generate a maximum a posteriori segmentation of the data (23, 24)”

    From Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood (2004) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Preprocessing passage (B. Human MR Data Sets, p. 7) says brain voxels were labeled as white matter, grey matter, CSF, and partial-volume combinations using a Bayesian classifier. It does not describe the classifier as extensively validated or specify a Gaussian mixture distribution or maximum a posteriori segmentation; the reported validation on p. 9 concerns the topology-correction result, not the tissue classifier. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7][7] P. Thompson, R. Woods, M. S. Mega, and A. W. Toga, 'Mathematical/computational challenges in creating deformable and probabilistic atlases of the human brain,' Human Brain Mapping , vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 81-92, 2000. -
  2. [9][9] H. A. Drury, D. C. Van Essen, M. Corbetta, and A. Z. Snyder, 'Surfacebased analysis of the human cerebral cortex,' in Brain Warping . New York: Academic, 1999, pp. 337-363. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shattuck, D. W., & Leahy, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2001
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
1167-1177
ISSN
0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023750321
Cited by
215
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH53213, R01MH053213)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013642, P41 RR13642)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
topological defects, cerebral cortex, spherical topology, marching cubes, Euler characteristic, 3D image segmentation, brain MRI
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Electronic Data Processing, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Computer Graphics, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review