Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Scaling theory for cylindrical, fully-depleted, surrounding-gate MOSFET's

Auth, C.P., Plummer, J.D.·1997·IEEE Electron Device Letters

Abstract

We present a scaling theory for fully-depleted, cylindrical MOSFET's. This theory was derived from the cylindrical form of Poisson's equation by assuming a parabolic potential in the radial direction. Numerical device simulation data for subthreshold slope and DIBL were compared to the model to validate the formula. By employing the scaling theory a comparison with double-gate (DG) MOSFET's was carried out illustrating an improvement of up to 40% in the minimum effective channel length for the cylindrical device.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/55.553049

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 565

Metadata

Authors
Auth, C. P., & Plummer, J. D.
Venue
IEEE Electron Device Letters
Published
1997-02
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
74-76
ISSN
  • 0741-3106 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0563
OpenAlex
W2120782742
Cited by
565
References
0
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaling theory for cylindrical, fully-depleted, surrounding-gate MOSFET's. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/55.553049
The paper
Auth, C. P., & Plummer, J. D. (1997). Scaling theory for cylindrical, fully-depleted, surrounding-gate MOSFET's. IEEE Electron Device Letters. https://doi.org/10.1109/55.553049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.