The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Globally convergent edge-preserving regularized reconstruction: an application to limited-angle tomography
Abstract
We introduce a generalization of a deterministic relaxation algorithm for edge-preserving regularization in linear inverse problems. This algorithm transforms the original (possibly nonconvex) optimization problem into a sequence of quadratic optimization problems, and has been shown to converge under certain conditions when the original cost functional being minimized is strictly convex. We prove that our more general algorithm is globally convergent (i.e., converges to a local minimum from any initialization) under less restrictive conditions, even when the original cost functional is nonconvex. We apply this algorithm to tomographic reconstruction from limited-angle data by formulating the problem as one of regularized least-squares optimization. The results demonstrate that the constraint of piecewise smoothness, applied through the use of edge-preserving regularization, can provide excellent limited-angle tomographic reconstructions. Two edge-preserving regularizers-one convex, the other nonconvex-are used in numerous simulations to demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm under various limited-angle scenarios, and to explore how factors, such as the choice of error norm, angular sampling rate and amount of noise, affect the reconstruction quality and algorithm performance. These simulation results show that for this application, the nonconvex regularizer produces consistently superior results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Sufficient conditions for the convergence of monotonic mathematicalprogramming algorithms
Meyer, R. R. (1976) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-0000(76)80021-9 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization
Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. (2008) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x · Cited by 4,863
A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays
Malioutov, D., Cetin, M., & Willsky, A. S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2005.850882 · Cited by 2,638
Sidky, E. Y., & Pan, X. (2008) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 · Cited by 1,995
Highly Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction via Homotopic $\ell_{0}$-Minimization
Trzasko, J., & Manduca, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2008.927346 · Cited by 490
Reconstructions in limited‐view thermoacoustic tomography
Xu, Y., Wang, L. V., Ambartsoumian, G., & Kuchment, P. (2004) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1644531 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Delaney, A. H., & Bresler, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-221
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101455165
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Globally convergent edge-preserving regularized reconstruction: an application to limited-angle tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.660997
- The paper
- Delaney, A. H., & Bresler, Y. (1998). Globally convergent edge-preserving regularized reconstruction: an application to limited-angle tomography. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.660997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.