Cited by 23Advanced Control Systems OptimizationGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBehavioral Health and Interventions

Hybrid model predictive control for optimizing gestational weight gain behavioral interventions

Open access
Yuwen Dong, Rivera, Daniel E., Downs, Danielle S., Savage, Jennifer S., Thomas, Diana M., Collins, Linda M.·2013·2013 American Control Conference

Abstract

Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) represents a major public health issue. In this paper, we pursue a control engineering approach to the problem by applying model predictive control (MPC) algorithms to act as decision policies in the intervention for assigning optimal intervention dosages. The intervention components consist of education, behavioral modification and active learning. The categorical nature of the intervention dosage assignment problem dictates the need for hybrid model predictive control (HMPC) schemes, ultimately leading to improved outcomes. The goal is to design a controller that generates an intervention dosage sequence which improves a participant's healthy eating behavior and physical activity to better control GWG. An improved formulation of self-regulation is also presented through the use of Internal Model Control (IMC), allowing greater flexibility in describing self-regulatory behavior. Simulation results illustrate the basic workings of the model and demonstrate the benefits of hybrid predictive control for optimized GWG adaptive interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/acc.2013.6580124

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Model predictive control, recommender systems, agent-based modeling, or Bayesian network analysis are plausible personalization algorithm strategies.

    “Model predictive control [40–43], recommender systems [44], agent-based modeling [45], or Bayesian network analysis [46] are all plausible personalization algorithm strategies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Downs DS Determinants and outcomes of physical activity in pregnancy: Findings from Active MOMS, a randomized physical activity intervention for pregnant women Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, Y., Rivera, D. E., Downs, D. S., Savage, J. S., Thomas, D. M., & Collins, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
Venue
2013 American Control Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-06
Pages
1970-1975
ISSN
0743-1619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139707015
Cited by
23
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL119245)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA024266, P50DA010075, K25DA021173)
  • Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
gestational weight gain, hybrid model predictive control, behavioral interventions, healthy eating habits, physical activity, self-regulation, internal model control, adaptive interventions, pregnant women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review