Cited by 64Advanced Control Systems OptimizationAdvanced Optimization Algorithms ResearchStability and Control of Uncertain Systems

An Improved Formulation of Hybrid Model Predictive Control With Application to Production-Inventory Systems

Open access
Nandola, Naresh N., Rivera, Daniel E.·2013·IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology

Abstract

We consider an improved model predictive control (MPC) formulation for linear hybrid systems described by mixed logical dynamical (MLD) models. The algorithm relies on a multiple-degree-of-freedom parametrization that enables the user to adjust the speed of setpoint tracking, measured disturbance rejection and unmeasured disturbance rejection independently in the closed-loop system. Consequently, controller tuning is more flexible and intuitive than relying on objective function weights (such as move suppression) traditionally used in MPC schemes. The controller formulation is motivated by the needs of nontraditional control applications that are suitably described by hybrid production-inventory systems. Two applications are considered in this paper: adaptive, time-varying interventions in behavioral health, and inventory management in supply chains under conditions of limited capacity. In the adaptive intervention application, a hypothetical intervention inspired by the Fast Track program, a real-life preventive intervention for reducing conduct disorder in at-risk children, is examined. In the inventory management application, the ability of the algorithm to judiciously alter production capacity under conditions of varying demand is presented. These case studies demonstrate that MPC for hybrid systems can be tuned for desired performance under demanding conditions involving noise and uncertainty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcst.2011.2177525

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Model predictive control, recommender systems, agent-based modeling, or Bayesian network analysis are plausible personalization algorithm strategies.

    “Model predictive control [40–43], recommender systems [44], agent-based modeling [45], or Bayesian network analysis [46] are all plausible personalization algorithm strategies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [23]Schwartz JD Next generation supply chain management: control, optimization, and system identification PhD thesis Arizona State University USA 2008
  2. [43]Braun MW Model-on-demand nonlinear estimation and model predictive control: Novel methodologies for process control and supply chain management PhD thesis Arizona State University USA 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nandola, N. N., & Rivera, D. E.
Affiliations
  • ABB (India) (IN)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
Published
2013-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
121-135
ISSN
  • 1063-6536 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0865
OpenAlex
W2037886542
Cited by
64
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA024266, K25DA021173)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Keywords
hybrid model predictive control, reference tracking, disturbance rejection, controller tuning, production-inventory systems, behavioral health interventions, conduct disorder, inventory management, supply chain capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review