The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring Recurrent Neural Networks for On-Line Handwritten Signature Biometrics
Open accessAbstract
Systems based on deep neural networks have made a breakthrough in many different pattern recognition tasks. However, the use of these systems with traditional architectures seems not to work properly when the amount of training data is scarce. This is the case of the on-line signature verification task. In this paper, we propose a novel writer-independent on-line signature verification systems based on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) with a Siamese architecture whose goal is to learn a dissimilarity metric from the pairs of signatures. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time these recurrent Siamese networks are applied to the field of on-line signature verification, which provides our main motivation. We propose both Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) systems with a Siamese architecture. In addition, a bidirectional scheme (which is able to access both past and future context) is considered for both LSTMand GRU-based systems. An exhaustive analysis of the system performance and also the time consumed during the training process for each recurrent Siamese network is carried out in order to compare the advantages and disadvantages for practical applications. For the experimental work, we use the BiosecurID database comprised of 400 users who contributed a total of 11,200 signatures in four separated acquisition sessions. Results achieved using our proposed recurrent Siamese networks have outperformed the state-of-the-art on-line signature verification systems using the same database.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
SIGNATURE VERIFICATION USING A “SIAMESE” TIME DELAY NEURAL NETWORK
BROMLEY, J., BENTZ, J. W., BOTTOU, L., GUYON, I., LECUN, Y., MOORE, C., SÄCKINGER, E., & SHAH, R. (1994) · Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1142/9789812797926_0003 · Cited by 2,350
Signature Verification Using A "Siamese" Time Delay Neural Network
BROMLEY, J., BENTZ, J. W., BOTTOU, L., GUYON, I., LECUN, Y., MOORE, C., SÄCKINGER, E., & SHAH, R. (1993) · International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1142/s0218001493000339 · Cited by 2,077
Theano: new features and speed improvements
Bastien, F., Lamblin, P., Pascanu, R., Bergstra, J., Goodfellow, I., Bergeron, A., Bouchard, N., Warde-Farley, D., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5590 · Cited by 1,005
Cited by
A review of state-of-the-art techniques for abnormal human activity recognition
Dhiman, C., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2019) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2018.08.014 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., & Ortega-Garcia, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 5128-5138
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2783471871
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring Recurrent Neural Networks for On-Line Handwritten Signature Biometrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2793966
- The paper
- Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2018). Exploring Recurrent Neural Networks for On-Line Handwritten Signature Biometrics. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2793966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.