Cited by 2,350Handwritten Text Recognition TechniquesUser Authentication and Security SystemsBiometric Identification and Security

SIGNATURE VERIFICATION USING A “SIAMESE” TIME DELAY NEURAL NETWORK

BROMLEY, JANE, BENTZ, JAMES W., BOTTOU, LÉON, GUYON, ISABELLE, LECUN, YANN, MOORE, CLIFF, SÄCKINGER, EDUARD, SHAH, ROOPAK·1994·Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This paper describes an algorithm for verification of signatures written on a pen-input tablet. The algorithm is based on a novel, artificial neural network, called a "Siamese" neural network. This network consists of two identical sub-networks joined at their outputs. During training the two sub-networks extract features from two signatures, while the joining neuron measures the distance between the two feature vectors. Verification consists of comparing an extracted feature vector with a stored feature vector for the signer. Signatures closer to this stored representation than a chosen threshold are excepted, all other signatures are rejected as forgeries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789812797926_0003

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most of the image registration methods using deep learning are based on a Siamese network.

    “Most of the image registration methods using deep learning are based on a Siamese network (Bromley et al., 1994;Merkle et al., 2017;He et al., 2018;Hughes et al., 2018a;Wang et al., 2018b).”

    From Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review (2019) · cites this paper as Bromley et al., 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BROMLEY, J., BENTZ, J. W., BOTTOU, L., GUYON, I., LECUN, Y., MOORE, C., SÄCKINGER, E., & SHAH, R.
Affiliations
AT&T (United States) (US)
Venue
Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence
Published
1994-01
Pages
25-44
ISSN
1793-0839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127589108
Cited by
2,350
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 177 · 2023: 218 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 350 · 2020: 409 · 2019: 339 · 2018: 194 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.85
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Series in machine perception and artificial intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
signature verification, Siamese network, time-delay neural networks, feature extraction, forgery detection, biometric authentication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review