Cited by 204Technology Adoption and User BehaviourTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesOnline and Blended Learning

Use of E-Learning by University Students in Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions: A Case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Open access
Al-Rahmi, Waleed Mugahed, Alias, Norma, Othman, Mohd Shahizan, Alzahrani, Ahmed Ibrahim, Alfarraj, Osama, Saged, Ali Ali, Abdul Rahman, Nur Shamsiah·2018·IEEE Access

Abstract

This paper examines university students' intention to utilize e-learning. In this paper, we apply and use the theory of a technology acceptance model. We employ the structural equation modeling approach with a SmartPLS software to investigate students' adoption process. Findings indicate that the content of e-learning and self-efficacy has a positive impact and substantially associated with perceived usefulness and student satisfaction, which impact university students' intention to utilize e-learning. Although e-learning has gained acceptance in universities around the world, the study of the intention to use e-learning is still largely unexplored in Malaysia. The developed model is employed to explain the university student's intention to utilize e-learning. The study concludes that university students in Malaysia have positive perceptions toward e-learning and intend to practice it for educational purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2802325

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., Saged, A. A., & Abdul Rahman, N. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • University of Malaya (MY)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2018
Volume
6
Pages
14268-14276
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791192301
Cited by
204
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7
FWCI
33.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • UMP Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Pahang) (acceptedVersion)
  • The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Research Management Centre at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (PY/2015/05399/R.J130000.7826.4F795)
  • Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University (RG-1438-062)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
e-learning adoption, university students, technology acceptance model, intention to use, perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, student satisfaction, e-learning content, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysian higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review