Cited by 94Music Technology and Sound StudiesInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMusic and Audio Processing

Smart Musical Instruments: Vision, Design Principles, and Future Directions

Open access
Turchet, Luca·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Smart musical instruments (SMIs) are a family of Internet of Musical Things devices for music creation. They are characterized by sensors, actuators, embedded intelligence, and wireless connectivity to local networks and to the Internet. In this paper, we depict a vision for this recent research area, which merges the research fields on digital musical instruments and smart objects, and fosters new types of interactions between the player and the instrument, between the player and other players, and between the player and audience members. We propose a set of capabilities and technical features characterizing SMIs, as well as a design for a technological architecture supporting them. To illustrate possible applications enabled by this vision, we present a set of scenarios exploiting the intelligence embedded in SMIs. We also propose a set of guidelines that can help digital luthiers in the process of designing SMIs. Finally, we present a set of directions for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2876891

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main current obstacle to the creation of SMIs is the lack of hardware and software tools able to guarantee low-latency in conjunction with all activities related to knowledge management, reasoning, and learning.

    “It is argued that the main current obstacle to the creation of SMIs is the lack of hardware and software tools able to guarantee low-latency in conjunction with all activities related to knowledge management, reasoning, and learning”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [20]20. A. Clément, F. Ribeiro, R. Rodrigues, and R. Penha, ''Bridging the gap between performers and the audience using networked smartphones: The a.bel system,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Live Interfaces, 2016, pp. 1-7.
  2. [24]24. C. Dobrian and D. Koppelman, ''The 'E' in NIME: Musical expression with new computer interfaces,'' in Proc. Conf. New Interfaces Musical Expression, 2006, pp. 277-282.
  3. [26]26. G. Essl and S. W. Lee, ''Mobile devices as musical instruments-State of the art and future prospects,'' in Proc. Int. Symp. Comput. Music Multidisciplinary Res., 2017, pp. 1-12.
  4. [44]44. A. R. Jensenius and M. J. Lyons, A NIME Reader: Fifteen Years of New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017.
  5. [53]53. V. Lazzarini, J. Timoney, and S. Byrne, ''Embedded sound synthesis,'' in Proc. Linux Audio Conf., 2015, pp. 1-21.
  6. [62]62. J. Malloch, S. Sinclair, and M. M. Wanderley, ''Libmapper: (A library for connecting things),'' in Proc. Extended Abstracts Human Factors Comput. Syst., 2013, pp. 3087-3090.
  7. [71]71. A. Migicovsky, J. Scheinerman, and G. Essl, ''MoveOSC-Smart watches in mobile music performance,'' in Proc. Int. Comput. Music Conf. Sound Music Comput. Conf., 2014, pp. 692-696.
  8. [77]77. F. Morreale and A. P. McPherson, ''Design for longevity: Ongoing use of instruments from NIME 2010-14,'' in Proc. Conf. New Interfaces Musical Expression (NIME), 2017, pp. 1-7.
  9. [78]78. F. Morreale, A. P. McPherson, and M. M. Wanderley, ''NIME identity from the performer's perspective,'' in Proc. Conf. New Interfaces Musical Expression, 2018, pp. 168-173.
  10. [81]81. D. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, 2013.
  11. [87]87. C. Palacio-Quintin, ''The hyper-flute,'' in Proc. Conf. New Interfaces Musical Expression, 2003, pp. 206-207.
  12. [89]89. D. Poirier-Quinot, B. Matuszewski, N. Schnell, and O. Warusfel, ''Nü soundworks: Using spectators smartphones as a distributed network of speakers and sensors during live performances,'' in Proc. Web Audio Conf., 2017, pp. 1-6.
  13. [94]94. D. Schuler and A. Namioka, Participatory Design: Principles and Prac- tices. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 1993.
  14. [101]101. S. Staab and R. Studer, Eds., Handbook on Ontologies. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2010.
  15. [107]107. L. Turchet and M. Barthet, ''An Internet of musical things architecture for performers-audience tactile interactions,'' in Proc. Digit. Music Res. Netw. Workshop, 2017.
  16. [108]108. L. Turchet and M. Barthet, ''Envisioning smart musical haptic wearables to enhance performers' creative communication,'' in Proc. Int. Symp. Comput. Music Multidisciplinary Res., 2017, pp. 538-549.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turchet, L.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Turchet, Luca
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
8944-8963
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896309540
Cited by
94
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (749561)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
Internet of Musical Things, digital musical instruments, smart objects, embedded intelligence, wireless connectivity, technical architecture, compositional process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review