The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepAnT: A Deep Learning Approach for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Time Series
Open accessAbstract
Traditional distance and density-based anomaly detection techniques are unable to detect periodic and seasonality related point anomalies which occur commonly in streaming data, leaving a big gap in time series anomaly detection in the current era of the IoT. To address this problem, we present a novel deep learning-based anomaly detection approach (DeepAnT) for time series data, which is equally applicable to the non-streaming cases. DeepAnT is capable of detecting a wide range of anomalies, i.e., point anomalies, contextual anomalies, and discords in time series data. In contrast to the anomaly detection methods where anomalies are learned, DeepAnT uses unlabeled data to capture and learn the data distribution that is used to forecast the normal behavior of a time series. DeepAnT consists of two modules: time series predictor and anomaly detector. Thetime series predictormodule uses deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict the next time stamp on the defined horizon. This module takes a window of time series (used as a context) and attempts to predict the next time stamp. The predicted value is then passed to theanomaly detectormodule, which is responsible for tagging the corresponding time stamp as normal or abnormal. DeepAnT can be trained even without removing the anomalies from the given data set. Generally, in deep learning-based approaches, a lot of data are required to train a model. Whereas in DeepAnT, a model can be trained on relatively small data set while achieving good generalization capabilities due to the effective parameter sharing of the CNN. As the anomaly detection in DeepAnT is unsupervised, it does not rely on anomaly labels at the time of model generation. Therefore, this approach can be directly applied to real-life scenarios where it is practically impossible to label a big stream of data coming from heterogeneous sensors comprising of both normal as well as anomalous points. We have performed a detailed evaluation of 15 algorithms on 10 anomaly detection benchmarks, which contain a total of 433 real and synthetic time series. Experiments show that DeepAnT outperforms the state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods in most of the cases, while performing on par with others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2008) · 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2008.17 · Cited by 6,601
Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution
Schölkopf, B., Platt, J. C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Smola, A. J., & Williamson, R. C. (2001) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976601750264965 · Cited by 6,168
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335388 · Cited by 5,207
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning
Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01578 · Cited by 3,974
Adversarial machine learning at scale
Kurakin, A., Goodfellow, I., & Bengio, S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01236 · Cited by 2,325
Kanarachos, S., Christopoulos, S.-R. G., Chroneos, A., & Fitzpatrick, M. E. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.028 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.070 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICMLA.2015.141 · DOI · Paper page
- kejariwal, 2015, Introducing practical and robust anomaly detection in a time series
- schreyer, 2017, Detection of anomalies in large scale accounting data using deep autoencoder networks, CoRR, abs 1709 5254, 1
- amarbayasgalan, 2018, Unsupervised novelty detection using deep autoencoders with density based clustering, Appl Sci, 8, 1468, 10.3390/app8091468 · DOI
- zheng, 2014, Time series classification using multi-channels deep convolutional neural networks, Proc Int Conf Web-Age Inf Manage, 298
- 2015, Contextual Anomaly Detector
- 10.1145/2783258.2788611 · DOI · Paper page
- cleveland, 1990, STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess, J Offic Statist, 6, 3
- 10.1080/00401706.1983.10487848 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICCSN.2010.55 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1155/2016/9653230 · DOI
- 10.2307/1266761 · DOI
- aggarwal, 2016, An introduction to outlier analysis, Outlier Analysis, 1
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2840086 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:MACH.0000008084.60811.49 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10115-012-0484-y · DOI
- kwitt, 2006, Robust methods for unsupervised PCA-based anomaly detection, Proc IEEE/IST Workshop Monitoring Attack Detection and Mitigation, 1
- shyu, 2003, A novel anomaly detection scheme based on principal component classifier, Proc IEEE Found New Directions Data Mining Workshop Conjunction 3rd IEEE Int Conf Data Mining (ICDM), 172
- 10.1109/ICDM.2007.61 · DOI
- wong, 2015, Rad—Outlier Detection on Big Data
- 10.1109/INM.2011.5990537 · DOI · Paper page
- adams, 2007, Bayesian Online Changepoint Detection
- ferrell, 2005, NASA Shuttle Valve Data
- 10.1109/ICDM.2005.79 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476975 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/347090.347160 · DOI · Paper page
- goix, 2016, How to evaluate the quality of unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms?
- dheeru, 2017, UCI Machine Learning Repository
- 10.1007/s10994-016-5567-7 · DOI
- aggarwal, 2016, Outlier Analysis
- 10.1145/335191.335437 · DOI · Paper page
- 2013, Skyline
- tang, 2002, Enhancing effectiveness of outlier detections for low density patterns, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 535, 10.1007/3-540-47887-6_53 · DOI · Paper page
- jin, 2006, Ranking outliers using symmetric neighborhood relationship, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 577, 10.1007/11731139_68 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-8655(03)00003-5 · DOI · Paper page
- goldstein, 2012, Histogram-based outlier score (HBOS): A fast unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm, KI-2012 Poster and Demo Track, 59
- 10.1145/2500853.2500857 · DOI · Paper page
- yahaya, 2018, Anomaly detection in activities of daily living using one-class support vector machine, Proc U K Workshop Comput Intell, 362
- columbus, 2017, 53% of Companies Are Adopting Big Data Analytics
- malhotra, 2015, Long short term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series, Proc Eur Symp Artif Neural Netw, 23, 89
- koetsier, 2017, IoT in the USA
- 10.1109/DSAA.2015.7344872 · DOI · Paper page
- lipton, 2015, Learning to diagnose with LSTM recurrent neural networks
- 10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966038 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2011.2174634 · DOI
- iandola, 2016, Squeezenet Alexnet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and< 0 5 mb model size
- chen, 2015, The UCR time series classification archive
- 10.1016/j.dss.2011.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4471-0219-9_20 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series
Deng, A., & Hooi, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16523 · Cited by 1,413
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
A Review on Outlier/Anomaly Detection in Time Series Data
Blázquez-García, A., Conde, A., Mori, U., & Lozano, J. A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3444690 · Cited by 1,102
Recurrent Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Review of Architectures, Variants, and Applications
Mienye, I. D., Swart, T. G., & Obaido, G. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15090517 · Cited by 732
Li, G., & Jung, J. J. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.008 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Munir, M., Siddiqui, S. A., Dengel, A., & Ahmed, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 1991-2005
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2906498146
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 21.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IW17002)
- Nvidia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepAnT: A Deep Learning Approach for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Time Series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2886457
- The paper
- Munir, M., Siddiqui, S. A., Dengel, A., & Ahmed, S. (2019). DeepAnT: A Deep Learning Approach for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Time Series. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2886457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.