Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 696

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DeepAnT: A Deep Learning Approach for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Time Series

Open access
Munir, Mohsin, Siddiqui, Shoaib Ahmed, Dengel, Andreas, Ahmed, Sheraz·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Traditional distance and density-based anomaly detection techniques are unable to detect periodic and seasonality related point anomalies which occur commonly in streaming data, leaving a big gap in time series anomaly detection in the current era of the IoT. To address this problem, we present a novel deep learning-based anomaly detection approach (DeepAnT) for time series data, which is equally applicable to the non-streaming cases. DeepAnT is capable of detecting a wide range of anomalies, i.e., point anomalies, contextual anomalies, and discords in time series data. In contrast to the anomaly detection methods where anomalies are learned, DeepAnT uses unlabeled data to capture and learn the data distribution that is used to forecast the normal behavior of a time series. DeepAnT consists of two modules: time series predictor and anomaly detector. Thetime series predictormodule uses deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict the next time stamp on the defined horizon. This module takes a window of time series (used as a context) and attempts to predict the next time stamp. The predicted value is then passed to theanomaly detectormodule, which is responsible for tagging the corresponding time stamp as normal or abnormal. DeepAnT can be trained even without removing the anomalies from the given data set. Generally, in deep learning-based approaches, a lot of data are required to train a model. Whereas in DeepAnT, a model can be trained on relatively small data set while achieving good generalization capabilities due to the effective parameter sharing of the CNN. As the anomaly detection in DeepAnT is unsupervised, it does not rely on anomaly labels at the time of model generation. Therefore, this approach can be directly applied to real-life scenarios where it is practically impossible to label a big stream of data coming from heterogeneous sensors comprising of both normal as well as anomalous points. We have performed a detailed evaluation of 15 algorithms on 10 anomaly detection benchmarks, which contain a total of 433 real and synthetic time series. Experiments show that DeepAnT outperforms the state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods in most of the cases, while performing on par with others.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2886457

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.070 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/ICMLA.2015.141 · DOI · Paper page
  3. kejariwal, 2015, Introducing practical and robust anomaly detection in a time series
  4. schreyer, 2017, Detection of anomalies in large scale accounting data using deep autoencoder networks, CoRR, abs 1709 5254, 1
  5. amarbayasgalan, 2018, Unsupervised novelty detection using deep autoencoders with density based clustering, Appl Sci, 8, 1468, 10.3390/app8091468 · DOI
  6. zheng, 2014, Time series classification using multi-channels deep convolutional neural networks, Proc Int Conf Web-Age Inf Manage, 298
  7. 2015, Contextual Anomaly Detector
  8. 10.1145/2783258.2788611 · DOI · Paper page
  9. cleveland, 1990, STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess, J Offic Statist, 6, 3
  10. 10.1080/00401706.1983.10487848 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/ICCSN.2010.55 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1155/2016/9653230 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/1266761 · DOI
  14. aggarwal, 2016, An introduction to outlier analysis, Outlier Analysis, 1
  15. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2840086 · DOI
  16. 10.1023/B:MACH.0000008084.60811.49 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/s10115-012-0484-y · DOI
  18. kwitt, 2006, Robust methods for unsupervised PCA-based anomaly detection, Proc IEEE/IST Workshop Monitoring Attack Detection and Mitigation, 1
  19. shyu, 2003, A novel anomaly detection scheme based on principal component classifier, Proc IEEE Found New Directions Data Mining Workshop Conjunction 3rd IEEE Int Conf Data Mining (ICDM), 172
  20. 10.1109/ICDM.2007.61 · DOI
  21. wong, 2015, Rad—Outlier Detection on Big Data
  22. 10.1109/INM.2011.5990537 · DOI · Paper page
  23. adams, 2007, Bayesian Online Changepoint Detection
  24. ferrell, 2005, NASA Shuttle Valve Data
  25. 10.1109/ICDM.2005.79 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476975 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1145/347090.347160 · DOI · Paper page
  28. goix, 2016, How to evaluate the quality of unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms?
  29. dheeru, 2017, UCI Machine Learning Repository
  30. 10.1007/s10994-016-5567-7 · DOI
  31. aggarwal, 2016, Outlier Analysis
  32. 10.1145/335191.335437 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 2013, Skyline
  34. tang, 2002, Enhancing effectiveness of outlier detections for low density patterns, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 535, 10.1007/3-540-47887-6_53 · DOI · Paper page
  35. jin, 2006, Ranking outliers using symmetric neighborhood relationship, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 577, 10.1007/11731139_68 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/S0167-8655(03)00003-5 · DOI · Paper page
  37. goldstein, 2012, Histogram-based outlier score (HBOS): A fast unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm, KI-2012 Poster and Demo Track, 59
  38. 10.1145/2500853.2500857 · DOI · Paper page
  39. yahaya, 2018, Anomaly detection in activities of daily living using one-class support vector machine, Proc U K Workshop Comput Intell, 362
  40. columbus, 2017, 53% of Companies Are Adopting Big Data Analytics
  41. malhotra, 2015, Long short term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series, Proc Eur Symp Artif Neural Netw, 23, 89
  42. koetsier, 2017, IoT in the USA
  43. 10.1109/DSAA.2015.7344872 · DOI · Paper page
  44. lipton, 2015, Learning to diagnose with LSTM recurrent neural networks
  45. 10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966038 · DOI
  46. 10.1109/TITS.2011.2174634 · DOI
  47. iandola, 2016, Squeezenet Alexnet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and< 0 5 mb model size
  48. chen, 2015, The UCR time series classification archive
  49. 10.1016/j.dss.2011.04.001 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/978-1-4471-0219-9_20 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 696

Metadata

Authors
Munir, M., Siddiqui, S. A., Dengel, A., & Ahmed, S.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
1991-2005
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906498146
Cited by
696
References
8
FWCI
21.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IW17002)
  • Nvidia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepAnT: A Deep Learning Approach for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Time Series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2886457
The paper
Munir, M., Siddiqui, S. A., Dengel, A., & Ahmed, S. (2019). DeepAnT: A Deep Learning Approach for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Time Series. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2886457

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.