The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noise Reduction in ECG Signals Using Fully Convolutional Denoising Autoencoders
Open accessAbstract
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is an efficient and noninvasive indicator for arrhythmia detection and prevention. In real-world scenarios, ECG signals are prone to be contaminated with various noises, which may lead to wrong interpretation. Therefore, significant attention has been paid on denoising of ECG for accurate diagnosis and analysis. A denoising autoencoder (DAE) can be applied to reconstruct the clean data from its noisy version. In this paper, a DAE using the fully convolutional network (FCN) is proposed for ECG signal denoising. Meanwhile, the proposed FCN-based DAE can perform compression with regard to the DAE architecture. The proposed approach is applied to ECG signals from the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database and the added noise signals are obtained from the MIT-BIH Noise Stress Test database. The denoising performance is evaluated using the root-mean-square error (RMSE), percentage-root-mean-square difference (PRD), and improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNRimp). The results of the experiments conducted on noisy ECG signals of different levels of input SNR show that the FCN acquires better performance as compared to the deep fully connected neural network- and convolutional neural network-based denoising models. Moreover, the proposed FCN-based DAE reduces the size of the input ECG signals, where the compressed data is 32 times smaller than the original. The results of the study demonstrate the superiority of FCN in denoising, with lower RMSE and PRD, as well as higher SNRimp. According to the results, we believe that the proposed FCN-based DAE has a good application prospect in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., Wu, M. C., Shih, H. H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.-C., Tung, C. C., & Liu, H. H. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 · Cited by 23,564
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Benjamin, E. J., Blaha, M. J., Chiuve, S. E., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., Deo, R., de Ferranti, S. D., Floyd, J., Fornage, M., Gillespie, C., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000485 · Cited by 12,591
Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010.
Alwan, A. (2011) · Cited by 8,494
Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders
Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., & Manzagol, P.-A. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390294 · Cited by 7,436
DeepFace: Closing the Gap to Human-Level Performance in Face Verification
Taigman, Y., Yang, M., Ranzato, M., & Wolf, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.220 · Cited by 6,542
Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)
Clevert, D.-A., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.07289 · Cited by 4,513
Convergence Results for Neural Networks via Electrodynamics
Panigrahy, R., Rahimi, A., Sachdeva, S., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Leibniz international proceedings in informatics · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2018.22 · Cited by 2,761
Cited by
Chuang, C.-H., Chang, K.-Y., Huang, C.-S., & Jung, T.-P. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119586 · Cited by 88
Systematic Review of Advanced AI Methods for Improving Healthcare Data Quality in Post COVID-19 Era
Isgut, M., Gloster, L., Choi, K., Venugopalan, J., & Wang, M. D. (2023) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2022.3216531 · Cited by 35
Wang, R., Liu, Z., Pang, J., Sun, J., Xiang, M., & Ning, X. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2025.3579060 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiang, H.-T., Hsieh, Y.-Y., Fu, S.-W., Hung, K.-H., Tsao, Y., & Chien, S.-Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 60806-60813
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2945801048
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 20.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noise Reduction in ECG Signals Using Fully Convolutional Denoising Autoencoders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2912036
- The paper
- Chiang, H.-T., Hsieh, Y.-Y., Fu, S.-W., Hung, K.-H., Tsao, Y., & Chien, S.-Y. (2019). Noise Reduction in ECG Signals Using Fully Convolutional Denoising Autoencoders. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2912036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.