Cited by 60Software Testing and Debugging TechniquesAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSoftware System Performance and Reliability

Testing and quality validation for AI software–perspectives, issues, and practices

Open access
Tao, Chuanqi, Gao, Jerry, Wang, Tiexin·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

With the fast growth of artificial intelligence and big data computing technologies, more and more software service systems have been developed using diverse machine learning models and technologies to make business and intelligent decisions based on their multimedia input to achieve intelligent features, such as image recognition, recommendation, decision making, prediction, etc. Nevertheless, there are increasing quality problems resulting in erroneous testing costs in enterprises and businesses. Existing work seldom discusses how to perform testing and quality validation for AI software. This paper focuses on quality validation for AI software function features. The paper provides our understanding of AI software testing for new features and requirements. In addition, current AI software testing categories are presented and different testing approaches are discussed. Moreover, test quality assessment and criteria analysis are illustrated. Furthermore, a practical study on quality validation for an image recognition system is performed through a metamorphic testing method. Study results show the feasibility and effectiveness of the approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2937107

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. J. Gao, C. L. Xie, and C. Q. Tao, ''Quality assurance for big data-issuss, challenges, and needs,'' in Proc. IEEE 10th Int. Symp. Service Oriented Syst. Eng., Apr. 2016, pp. 433-441.
  2. A. Souri, M. E. Akbari, and A. Salehpour, ''Reduction and modification of test cases in Web applications by using multi objective genetic algorithm,'' J. Amer. Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 757-762, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tao, C., Gao, J., & Wang, T.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
120164-120175
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969466556
Cited by
60
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1003900)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61402229, 61602267)
  • Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NS2019058)
  • State Key Laboratory of Novel Software Technology (KFKT2018B19)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
Keywords
metamorphic testing, image recognition system, test quality evaluation, test criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review