Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial, Physiological and Environmental Sensors: A Comprehensive Survey
Open accessAbstract
In the last decade, Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has become a vibrant research area, especially due to the spread of electronic devices such as smartphones, smartwatches and video cameras present in our daily lives. In addition, the advance of deep learning and other machine learning algorithms has allowed researchers to use HAR in various domains including sports, health and well-being applications. For example, HAR is considered as one of the most promising assistive technology tools to support elderly's daily life by monitoring their cognitive and physical function through daily activities. This survey focuses on critical role of machine learning in developing HAR applications based on inertial sensors in conjunction with physiological and environmental sensors.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey reviews human activity recognition research from January 2015 to September 2019 that uses inertial, physiological, and environmental sensors, while excluding vision-based approaches. It reports that classic machine learning remained more common than deep learning, with similar average accuracy, but that reproducibility and generalization are constrained by private, controlled datasets.
Key findings
- Among 149 eligible papers, 96 used classic machine learning and 53 used deep learning; average recognition accuracy was 92.2% for classic models and 93% for deep models.
- The most common deep models were CNN (30 papers, 93.7% average accuracy over about 11 activities), LSTM (17 papers, 91.5% over about 17 activities), and RNN (8 papers, 95% over about 14 activities).
- The most common classic models were SVM (35 papers, 92.3% over about 12 activities), kNN (23 papers, 93.7% over about 12 activities), decision trees (19 papers, 94.2% over about 8 activities), random forests (15 papers, 93.3% over about 10 activities), and neural networks (14 papers, 93.5% over about 8 activities).
- Accelerometers appeared in all 149 selected papers, with 83 also using gyroscopes and 27 also using magnetometers; only 30 of 142 datasets were publicly available, and 78% of proposed methods were not fully reproducible because of proprietary data.
Methods
- The authors conducted a systematic literature search in Google Scholar for January 2015 to September 2019 using terms related to human activity recognition, machine learning, deep learning, wearable sensors, and specific sensors; from 249,110 records they selected 293 by publication venue, then applied PRISMA-style exclusions to reach 149 eligible papers.
- Exclusions removed surveys and inaccessible papers, books, vision-based studies, papers without accelerometers, non-daily-life activities, pre-2015 work, and non-machine-learning thresholding approaches.
- The review organizes studies by sensor/device type, data type, preprocessing and feature extraction, classification model, and evaluation metrics, using accuracy as the common comparison metric across papers.
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: most reviewed methods are not fully reproducible because of proprietary datasets; only 30 of 142 datasets are public; data are often collected in controlled or scripted settings; inter-subject and intra-subject variability is poorly represented; 87 of 149 models were tested on only one dataset, and only one method was tested on 14 datasets; interpretability is weakened by commercial tools and unavailable source code; methods are often rigid to specific sensors; and accuracy is used for comparison even though it is not always the most representative metric for unbalanced data.
- Evident from the text: the survey’s scope excludes vision-based HAR and requires accelerometer use, so its conclusions may not extend to image/video-based or non-accelerometer HAR; the search is limited to Google Scholar and four publishers over a specific 2015–2019 window.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Among the initial 293 published papers identified, 46 were survey papers published since 2015.
“Among the initial 293 published papers that we identified, 46 were survey papers published since 2015.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of CML-based HAR models was greater than the number of DL-based HAR models in each year except 2019.
“It shows that the number of CML-based HAR models was, except 2019, greater than the number of DL-based HAR models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 46 survey papers, 23 were excluded because they were exclusively video-based HAR papers.
“Among such 46 survey papers, we excluded 23 papers which were exclusively video-based HAR papers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Most HAR reviews focus on data management methods and activity recognition models.
“Most of these HAR reviews focus on data management methods and activity recognition models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
After exclusions, 149 papers were eligible.
“As a result, 149 were eligible, as Figures 1 and 4 show.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The use of smart devices such as smartphones and smartwatches is outnumbering the use of standalone devices.
“As shown in Figure 8, the use of smart devices like smartphone and smartwatch is outnumbering the use of standalone devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
All 23 surveys on HAR methods summarized in Table I, including those not taken into consideration because they were video-based, had not reported their systematic review process such as PRISMA.
“It should be noted that all these surveys, including those not taken into consideration (video-based), had not reported their systematic review process (e.g., using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During 2015 to 2019, 46 surveys and 20 articles proposing non-machine-learning methodologies were published among the selected papers.
“During the same time period were published 46 surveys and 20 articles proposing not ML-based methodologies (e.g., threshold models).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In terms of recognition accuracy, methodologies based on smartphone and smartwatch devices are in line with those obtained from standalone devices.
“Figure 8.(b) shows that in terms of recognition accuracy methodologies based on smartphone and smartwatch devices are in line with those obtained from standalone devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Several studies focus on activities performed at specific locations, such as sitting on the ground, lying on bed, walking or standing in the elevator, walking or running on a treadmill, walking in a parking lot, exercising on a stepper, or exercising on a cross trainer.
“Several studies focus on activities performed on specific locations, such as sitting on the ground, lying on bed [69]–[71], walking/standing in the elevator [71]–[74], walking/running on a treadmill, walking in a parking lot, exercising on a stepper [71], or exercising on a cross trainer [71], [75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Other types of sensors such as environmental sensors, radio signals, medical equipment, and other built-in sensors are common in HAR.
“However, other type of sensors as environmental sensors (temperature [7], [60], [76], [79], [87]–[89], humidity [79], [87], light [60], [90], Passive Infrared Sensor (PIR) [88]), radio signals (WiFi and Bluetooth [56], [62], [87]), medical equipment (ECG [56], [77], EMG [72]) or other type of build in sensors (GPS [7], [43], [87], [90]–[93], compass [91], [93], heart rate [89], [94]–[96], barom”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Not all reviewed articles present results in terms of precision, recall, sensitivity, F1-Score, AUC, or ROC curve.
“Not all articles present the results obtained in terms of precision, recall, sensitivity, F1-Score, Area Under the Curve (AUC) or Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve, despite being more representative metrics, especially with unbalanced data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The majority of DL-based methodologies do not use any noise removal or feature extraction step.
“the majority of them do not make use of any Noise Removal and Feature Extraction step as shown in Tab. VIII, rows 10 and 14.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
95 of the 149 reviewed papers presented an HAR methodology based on classical ML.
“Among the 149 reviewed papers, as shown in Figure 1, 95 presented an HAR methodology based on classical ML.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The average accuracy among the 34 DL-based articles that do not use noise removal or feature extraction was 93%.
“The achieved average accuracy, among all these 34 articles, was 93%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The proposed methodologies are usually very rigid regarding the data source.
“the proposed methodologies are usually very rigid regarding the data source.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
48 CML-based articles and 12 DL-based articles use different noise removal techniques.
“48 CML-based articles and 12 DL-based articles make use of different noise removal techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The data used in the investigated papers are collected primarily in a controlled environment.
“the data used in the investigated papers are collected primarily in a controlled environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
CML models are still used more widely than complex DL-based models.
“CML models are still used more widely than complex DL-based models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CNN models achieved an average accuracy of 93.7% over an average of 11 activities of daily life.
“The CNN models obtained an average accuracy of 93.7% in activity recognition over an average number of 11 activities of daily life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The selection of the precise DL or CML model is primarily based on computational requirements and the amount of available training data.
“the selection of the precise DL or CML model is primarily based on the computational requirements and the amount of available training (labeled) data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some articles use time- and frequency-domain features without applying any noise removal technique.
“Tab. VIII, row 3 shows articles that use time and frequency domain features without applying any noise removal technique.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The DL models comprised 54 papers of the 149 reviewed.
“The DL models, as shown in Figure 1 comprised 54 papers of the 149 papers we reviewed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among a total of 142 datasets, only 30 datasets are publicly available.
“among a total of 142 datasets, only 30 datasets are publicly available”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Other classical ML models used include Naïve Bayes, Dynamic Bayesian Network, Hidden Markov Models, Extreme Learning Machine, PCA, LDA, QDA, and many others.
“Other used models are the Naïve Bayes (NB) [4], [42], [94], [122], [136], [142], [159], [169], [171], [184], [185], [210], the Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) [101], [103], [166], Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [68], [69], [151], [179], [182], [208], Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) [153], [154], Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For 78% of the proposed HAR methodologies, the results are not fully reproducible due to proprietary datasets.
“for 78% of the proposed HAR methodologies, the results are not fully reproducible due to proprietary datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LSTM models achieved an average accuracy of 91.5% over an average of 17 activities of daily life.
“It obtained an average accuracy of 91.5% over an average number of 17 activities of daily life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Accuracy is the only common metric among the reviewed articles.
“accuracy is the only common metric among them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Smartphones and smartwatches, unlike standalone devices, provide computational capabilities that make it possible to directly execute HAR models on the wearable device.
“Moreover, smartphones and smartwatches [193], unlike standalone devices, provide computational capabilities that make it possible to directly execute HAR models on the wearable device”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [193] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Combining multiple heterogeneous or homogeneous sources with data fusion techniques provides advantages including noise reduction, reduced uncertainty, increased robustness, robustness to interference, and integration of prior knowledge.
“The use of multiple sources (heterogeneous or homogeneous) combined with data fusion techniques provides several advantages, including 1) noise reduction, 2) reduced uncertainty, 3) increased robustness of the fusion phase, 4) robustness to interference, and 5) integration of prior knowledge of the perceived signals [56], [57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Many HAR models are being used to help users recognize and avoid risky situations, such as falls in elderly people or Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's disease.
“Many HAR models are being used to help users recognize and avoid risky situations, such as falls in elderly people [79]–[85] or Freezing of Gait (FoG) in Parkinson’s disease [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [79]–[85]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
HAR is emerging as a powerful tool for monitoring the physical, functional, and cognitive health of older adults in their homes.
“To monitor physical, functional, and cognitive health of older adults in their home, HAR is emerging as a powerful tool [2]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Physiological signals can be used to continuously measure affective events.
“They can be used to continuously measure the affective events. [195]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [195] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
DL-based models eliminate the latency due to the need to process data with noise removal and feature extraction techniques.
“DL-based models eliminate the latency due to the need to process data with the above techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: DL networks perform automatic feature extraction without human intervention, unlike traditional machine-learning algorithms.
- Interpretationown data
The lack of reproducibility creates barriers for the research community in identifying the best models and benchmarking results.
“This results in barriers for the research community for the identification of the best models and benchmarking the results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
DL-based HAR methods have produced excellent results in terms of recognition performance in recent years.
“In recent years, DL-based HAR methods have produced excellent results in terms of recognition performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Methodologies that use noise removal and time- and frequency-domain feature extraction show promising accuracy results.
“the methodologies that make use of noise removal methods and feature extraction in the time and frequency domain show promising results”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The heterogeneity of the data and the definition of a HAR methodology that can recognize activities across people with different physical and motor characteristics conflicts with the data sources used for data collection.
“the heterogeneity of the data and the definition of a HAR methodology that can recognize the activities carried out by people with different physical and motor characteristics collides with the data sources used for data collection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
DL models have shown higher capacity in recognizing many complex activities.
“the DL models have shown higher capacity in recognizing many complex activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is an issue with interpretability of results, mainly related to papers presenting similar methodologies and tested on the same dataset, claiming to achieve almost the same accuracy.
“Another significant issue concerns the interpretability of the results, mainly related to papers presenting similar methodologies and tested on the same dataset, claiming to achieve almost the same results in terms of activity recognition accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It becomes difficult to have a methodology tested on a particular individual using a particular sensor and subsequently changing the sensor model.
“it becomes difficult to have a methodology tested on a particular individual by making use of a particular sensor(s) and subsequently changing the sensor model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Different sensors have different technical characteristics, including measurement error and noise.
- Interpretationreasoning
The lack of public heterogeneous datasets reduces the possibility of creating HAR models with better generalization capabilities.
“the lack of public heterogeneous datasets reduces the possibility of creating HAR models with better generalization capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
- May combine two claims. 44
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe most common types of sensors used in activity recognition are accelerometers, mainly because of their small size and low cost.
“The most common types of sensors used in activity recognition are accelerometers, mainly due to their small size and low cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong all reviewed published papers, proposed HAR methods are based mostly on standalone devices, but the total number of smartphone- and smartwatch-based methods is higher than those based on standalone devices.
“Finally, as shown in Figure 8.(a), among all the reviewed published papers, the proposed HAR methods are based mostly on standalone devices. However, the total number of smartphone- and smartwatch-based methods are higher than those based on standalone devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the 149 selected papers, 149 used accelerometers, 83 used gyroscopes in addition to accelerometers, and 27 used a magnetometer in addition to the accelerometer.
“As depicted in Figure 7.(a), 149 papers used accelerometers, 83 used gyroscopes in addition to accelerometers, and 27 used a magnetometer in addition to the accelerometer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe average number of citations of the chosen articles was 46.
“The average number of citations was 46, and the distribution of the papers for each year is shown in Table II.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll selected papers use at least one accelerometer or at least one accelerometer in combination with other sensors.
“Therefore, all the selected papers use at least one accelerometer or at least one accelerometer in combination with other sensors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenNo existing survey article presents a comprehensive meta-review of existing surveys, provides a comprehensive overview of different sensors, reports and compares performance metrics, and reports on dataset availability and popularity.
“To the best of our knowledge, no existing survey article is (1) presenting a comprehensive meta-review of the existing surveys, (2) providing a comprehensive overview of different sensors, (3) reporting and comparing performance metrics, and (4) reporting on dataset availability and popularity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIn many cases, accelerometers are used together with other sensors including gyroscopes, magnetometers, compasses, pressure sensors, body temperature sensors, electromyography, oximetry sensors, and electrocardiographs.
“In many cases, accelerometers are used in conjunction with others sensors including gyroscopes, magnetometers, compasses, pressure sensors, body temperature sensors, electromyography, oximetry sensors, and electrocardiographs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAverage activity recognition accuracy among the 53 DL-based papers and the 96 CML-based papers was 93% and 92.2%, respectively, showing almost the same recognition quality.
“Figure 1.(b) shows the average activity recognition accuracy, among the 53 DL-based papers and the 96 CML-based papers, that as visible (93% DL-based and 92.2% CML-based) present almost the same recognition quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationOther detailed movement recognition involves specific movements of the arms, such as carrying or reaching an object, releasing it, frontal elevation, and other activities performed in relation to other objects.
“Other detailed movement recognition involves specific movements of the arms, such as carrying/reaching an object, releasing it, frontal elevation, and other activities that people can perform in relation to other objects [76]–[78].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong 149 selected published papers on HAR from 2015 to 2019, 53 were based on DL models and 96 were based on CML models.
“among a total of 149 selected published papers on HAR, 53 were based on DL models, and 96 were based on CML models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe keyword search produced a total of 249,110 records, from which 293 were selected based on the quality of the publication venue.
“Our keywords produced a total of 249110 records, among which we selected 293 based on the quality of the publication venue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationOther activities explored in HAR research include complex activities such as different phases of cooking, house cleaning, driving, smoking, swimming, or biking.
“However, other type of activities have been explored in the past few years, including complex activities, such as the different phases of cooking [59], house cleaning [4], [59]–[61], driving [62]–[65], smoking [66], swimming [67], or biking [6], [43], [64], [68].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe largest amount of data on daily life is collected via electronic devices such as smartphones, smartwatches, activity trackers, smart thermostats, and video cameras.
“However, as we discussed earlier, the largest amount of data on daily life is collected via electronic devices, such as smartphones, smartwatches, activity trackers, smart thermostats and video cameras.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAmong all activities of daily life, the most popular activities in HAR research are walking, running, standing, sitting, walking upstairs, and walking downstairs.
“Among all ADL’s, the most popular activities in HAR research are walking, running, standing, sitting, walking upstairs and walking downstairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe most commonly studied activities in these datasets are primary activities of daily life such as walking, running, sitting, standing, walking upstairs, walking downstairs, and sleeping.
“The most common studied activities are primary activities of daily life, such as walking, running, sitting, standing, walking upstairs, walking downstairs, and sleeping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCNN is the most popular DL model, referenced in 30 papers.
“The most popular model is the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which was referenced in 30 papers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the 149 analyzed HAR models, 87 were tested on a single dataset, and 62 were tested on more than one dataset.
“Among the 149 analyzed HAR models, 87 models were tested on a single dataset, with the remaining 62 tested on more than one dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSVM is the most commonly used classical ML model, used in 35 papers, achieving an average accuracy of 92.3% over an average of 12 activities.
“the most commonly used model was the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model [4], [6], [58], [60], [69], [78], [79], [82], [85], [92], [95], [109], [118], [127], [131], [132], [136], [138], [142], [145], [155], [168], [169], [171], [173], [182], [184], [186], [187], [189], [190], [209]–[212] which was used in 35 papers, achieving an average accuracy of 92.3% over an average of 12 activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe open-source HAR datasets listed in Table VI predominantly use accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer sensors.
“Such datasets are largely based on accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer sensor data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data28 HAR methodologies were tested on two datasets, 21 on three datasets, fewer than 10 on 4-6 datasets, and only one methodology was tested on 14 datasets.
“we found that 28 HAR methodologies were tested on two datasets, 21 HAR methodologies on three datasets, less than 10 HAR methodologies on 4–6 datasets, and only one methodology [219] was tested on a total of 14 datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenA variety of sensors and devices are used for data collection.
“a variety of sensors and devices are used for data collection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataRF is the fourth most used classical ML model, used in 15 papers, obtaining an average accuracy of 93.3% over an average of 10 activities.
“and the Random Forest (RF) [6], [57], [69], [72], [78]–[80], [82], [92], [93], [95], [96], [175], [185], [212], which was used in 15 papers, obtaining an average accuracy of 93.3% over an average of 10 activities of daily life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe most used normalization steps are z-normalization, min-max, and linear interpolation, preceded by filtering steps such as outlier detection, Butterworth, median, high-pass, or statistical filters.
“Among all such techniques the most used ones are: z-normalization [75], [120], min-max [70], [127], and linear interpolation [102], [111] are the most used normalization steps, preceded by a filtering step based on the application of outlier detection [70], [117], [163], Butterworth [82], [101], [117], [123], [127], [128], [152], [155], [174], [189], median [74], [101], [117], [127], [132], [147],”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenCML models are more popular than DL models.
“CML models still enjoy great popularity compared to those based on the relatively more recent and more advanced models such as the DL models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCML-based approaches are still widely used and generate outstanding results without the computational costs.
“CML-based approaches are still widely used, and they generate outstanding results without the computational costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMany articles used different classification models, not just one, for better performance.
“many articles made use of different classification models and not just one model for achieving better performance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe most widely used, if not indispensable, sensor is the accelerometer, which can be used with other sensors such as the gyroscope or magnetometer.
“the most widely used used, if not indispensable, sensor is the accelerometer, which can be used in conjunction with other sensors such as the gyroscope or the magnetometer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther DL-based articles use time-domain, frequency-domain, or both time- and frequency-domain features.
“other DL-based articles do make use of time-domain (Tab. VIII, row 12) features, frequency domain (Tab. VIII, row 11) and both time and frequency domain (Tab. VIII, rows 13 and 14) features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenSome articles tested their approaches using different models.
“some of the articles have tested their approaches using different models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenActivity recognition algorithms based on ML and DL are becoming central in HAR.
“Activity recognition algorithms based on ML and DL are becoming central in HAR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMost proposed HAR models are only tested on a limited number of activities and captured in a single controlled environment.
“most proposed HAR models are only tested on a limited number of activities and captured in a single controlled environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe number of activities in these datasets ranges from two to thirty-three.
“the number of activities in these datasets ranges from two [202] to thirty-three [205] (Table VI).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datakNN is the second most used classical ML model, used in 23 papers, achieving an average accuracy of 93.7% over an average of 12 activities.
“The second most used model is the classical k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) model [4], [6], [42], [60], [61], [69], [78], [79], [92], [95], [96], [113], [118], [122], [127], [136], [142], [145], [162], [164], [169], [173], [186], which was used in 23 papers, achieving an average accuracy of 93.7% over an average of 12 activities of daily life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLSTM is the second most used DL model, used in 17 papers.
“The second most used model was the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, which was used in 17 papers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNN is the fifth most used classical ML model, used in 14 papers, obtaining an average accuracy of 93.5% over an average of 8 activities.
“The fifth most used model is the Neural Networks (NN) [4], [78], [92], [98], [114], [136], [142], [145], [148], [157], [173], [183]–[185], which was used in 14 papers, obtaining an average accuracy of 93.5% over an average of 8 activities of daily life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMany HAR methodologies use overlapping segments between consecutive windows, which provides the model with knowledge of previous context.
“Besides, many methodologies maintain an overlapping part between two consecutive segments. This part provides the model with knowledge of the previous context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost reviewed CML-based articles use both time- and frequency-domain features and apply noise removal preprocessing.
“most of the reviewed articles (Tab. VIII, row 7) make use of both time and frequency domain features, and the raw data was initially pre-processed with noise removal techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMost sensors in these datasets are embedded in smartphones and smartwatches.
“Most of such sensors are embedded into smartphones and smartwatches”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome methodologies do not use any feature extraction technique, and in some cases noise is not considered.
“other methodologies (Tab. VIII, rows 8 and 9) do not make use of any features extraction technique, and in some cases, the presence of noise is not considered”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRNN models were used in 8 papers, over an average of 14 activities, obtaining an average accuracy of 95%.
“Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) were used in [8], [56], [89], [112], [129], [213], [216], [217], over an average number of 14 obtaining an average accuracy of 95%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe remaining DL papers (Other) were based on models such as Autoencoders, Inception Neural Networks, or other frameworks, totaling 7 papers with an average accuracy of 91.1% and an average of 17 activities.
“the rest of the papers (indicated by Other in Figure 9) where based on models such as Autoencoders [71], [123], Inception Neural Networks (INN), or the other frameworks [105] for a total of 7 papers with an average accuracy of 91.1% and an average number of 17 activities of daily life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDT is the third most used classical ML model, used in 19 papers, obtaining an average accuracy of 94.2% over an average of 8 activities.
“The third and fourth most used model are the Decision Tree (DT) model [6], [78], [85], [94], [95], [113], [136], [142], [145], [159], [165], [173], [177], [178], [184], [185], [193], [208], [210], [212], which was used in 19 papers, obtaining an average accuracy of 94.2% over an average of 8 activities of daily life”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdvanced activity tracking devices can recognize sleeping and the neurological stages of sleep, cycling through nREM stages 1 to 4 and REM.
“Advanced devices can recognize sleeping and the neurological stages of sleep (i.e., cycling through nREM (stages 1–4) and REM) [86]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe large inter-subject and intra-subject variability of human movement entails considerable difficulty in developing a methodology that generalizes among all subjects.
“Such variability entails a considerable difficulty in developing a methodology that manages to generalize among all subjects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Human movement patterns are very hard to recognize because of large inter-subject and intra-subject variability.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile DL methods produce high accuracy on large activity datasets, in many HAR applications Classic Machine Learning models might be better suited because of small dataset size, lower input dimensionality, and availability of expert knowledge.
“While DL methods produce high accuracy results on large activity datasets, in many HAR applications Classic Machine Learning (CML) models might be better suited due to the small size of the dataset, lower dimensionality of the input data, and availability of expert knowledge in formulating the problem [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGated Recurrent Neural Networks have shown advantages in modeling sequential dependencies in long-term time-series.
“Gated RNNs have shown advantages in modeling sequential dependencies in long-term time-series [44].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep Learning techniques can automatically generate optimal features from raw input data without human intervention, making it possible to identify unknown patterns.
“Since DL is based on the idea of the data representation, such techniques can automatically generate optimal features, starting from the raw input data, without any human intervention, making it possible to identify the unknown patterns that otherwise would remain hidden or unknown [44].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHuman Activity Recognition has become a popular research topic in the last decade because of its importance in health care, interactive gaming, sports, and general monitoring systems.
“Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has become a popular topic in the last decade due to its importance in many areas, including health care, interactive gaming, sports, and monitoring systems for general purposes [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause of the limitations of Deep Learning, Classic Machine Learning methods are still preferred in some areas, especially when the training dataset is small or fast training is required.
“Because of such limitations, in some areas still CML methods are preferred, especially when the training dataset is quite small, or when fast training is a requirement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe most common sensor fusion methods are typically based on Bayesian estimation, Kalman Filters, and Particle Filtering.
“The most common sensor fusion methods are typically based on Bayesian estimation, Kalman Filters, and Particle Filtering techniques [58].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep Learning models present limitations including being black-box models, difficult interpretation, requiring large datasets for training, and high computational cost.
“However, as already mentioned, DL models also present some limitation [45]: Black-box models, interpretation is not easy and inherent,Require large datasets for training,High computational cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Marcus, 2018, Deep learning: A critical appraisal
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHAR research has seen an explosion in Deep Learning methods, resulting in an increase in recognition accuracy.
“In terms of algorithmic implementation, HAR research has seen an explosion in Deep Learning (DL) methods, resulting in an increase in recognition accuracy [5], [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeep Learning algorithms have become popular in many domains because of their superior performance.
“On the other side, in recent years, DL algorithms have become popular in many domains, due to their superior performance [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCollecting video data for HAR presents privacy and computational issues.
“Cameras have been widely used in the HAR applications, however collecting video data presents many issues regarding privacy and computational requirements [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHAR algorithms face challenges including the complexity and variety of daily activities, intra-subject and inter-subject variability, the trade-off between performance and privacy, computational efficiency in embedded and portable devices, and difficulty of data annotation.
“Despite myriad applications, HAR algorithms still face many challenges, including 1) complexity and variety of daily activities, 2) intra-subject and inter-subject variability for the same activity, 3) the trade-off between performance and privacy, 4) computational efficiency in embedded and portable devices, and 5) difficulty of data annotation [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe review's retrieval process followed the PRISMA template for systematic reviews.
“Figure 4 shows our retrieval process based on PRISMA template for systematic reviews [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenDL models have a unique ability to recognize more complex activities while maintaining high accuracy.
“DL models have a unique ability to recognize more complex activities, while maintaining high accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe interpretability issue is related to tests performed using commercial tools, lack of open source code, and authors not publicly providing their source code.
“Such an issue is related to tests performed using commercial tools, lack of open source code, and authors who do not publicly provide their source code.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDL models do not require a data preprocessing stage.
“they do not require a data preprocessing stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: DL networks perform automatic feature extraction without human intervention, unlike traditional machine-learning algorithms.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHAR researchers still prefer classic ML models, mainly because they require a smaller amount of data and less computational power than DL models.
“HAR researchers still prefer classic ML models, mainly because they require a smaller amount of data and less computational power than DL models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CML models require a smaller amount of training data and lower computational requirements than DL models.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSensor-based HAR has many advantages compared to vision-based HAR methodologies, which pose privacy concerns and are constrained by computational requirements.
“sensor-based HAR have many advantages compared to vision-based HAR methodologies, which pose privacy concerns and are constrained by computational requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThis situation shows the challenge of identifying a methodology superior to the others.
“This situation shows the challenge of identifying a methodology superior to the others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBecause HAR imposes constraints such as reduced latency, memory constraint, and computational constraints, the common supervised classifiers except SVM are appropriate for low-resource environments given their low computational and memory requirements.
“Furthermore, since HAR imposes specific constraints, such as reduced latency, memory constraint, and computational constraints, these classifiers, except for SVM, are appropriate for low-resource environments given their low computational and memory requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInertial sensors are widely used in clinical and healthcare applications.
“Such inertial sensors are widely used in clinical and healthcare applications. [194]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [194] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHAR systems have become a growing research area in the past decade, achieving impressive progress.
“HAR systems have become a growing research area in the past decade, achieving impressive progress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPreprocessing raw data eliminates noise and prepares it for recognition models.
“The presence of noise is handled by preprocessing the raw data to eliminate this interference and prepare the data for being feed to the recognition models [35].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCML models require a smaller amount of training data and lower computational requirements than DL models.
“CML models require a smaller amount of training data, as well as lower computational requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CML models require a smaller amount of training data and lower computational requirements than DL models.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTime-domain features are more commonly used than frequency-domain features because they are less computationally expensive due to the transform required for frequency-domain features.
“Time-domain features are the most used because they are cheaper than the frequency domain features because of the transform from time to frequency domain [35].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningOne of the main limitations of HAR algorithms is the lack of standardized methodologies that can generalize to heterogeneous sets of activities performed by diverse users.
“One of the main limitations of HAR algorithms is the lack of standardized methodologies that can generalize to heterogeneous set of activities performed by a diverse set of users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnsupervised clustering techniques are particularly suitable when working with datasets lacking labels or when the measure of similarity or dissimilarity between classes is a primary outcome.
“These techniques are particularly suitable when working with datasets lacking labels or when the measure of similarity/dissimilarity between classes is a primary outcome [41]–[43].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]–[43]
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Human movement patterns are very hard to recognize because of large inter-subject and intra-subject variability.
“That is because human movement patterns are very hard to recognize due to the large inter-subject and intra-subject variability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The lack of data collected from a very large number of subjects hinders finding a solution to the generalization problem.
“Also, the lack of data collected from a very large number of subjects does not help researchers find a solution to this problem.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Activity tracking devices can approximate physiological and physical parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, steps, level changes, and calories consumed.
“Those devices are able to approximate physiological and physical parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, steps, level changes, and calories consumed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Physiological signals are mostly involuntary and quite insensitive to deception.
“Those signals are mostly involuntary and, as such, are quite insensitive to deception.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Acceleration and angular velocity are the most common data used to characterize human activity.
“Besides, acceleration and angular velocity are the most common data used to characterize human activity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Raw sensor data contains noise that makes it difficult to use in its raw state.
“data is characterized by noise, which makes it difficult to be used in their raw state.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Standard classification models are not suitable for raw data.
“standard classification models are not suitable for raw data”
The paper relies on this without support.
DL networks perform automatic feature extraction without human intervention, unlike traditional machine-learning algorithms.
“DL networks perform automatic feature extraction without human intervention, unlike traditional machine-learning algorithms”
The paper relies on this without support.
DL models require a more considerable amount of data than ML models and longer training times.
“such models require a more considerable amount of data than ML models and longer training times.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CML models require a smaller amount of training data and lower computational requirements than DL models.
“CML models require a smaller amount of training data, as well as lower computational requirements.”
The paper relies on this without support.
DL models are inherently difficult to interpret.
“DL models are inherently difficult to interpret.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Different sensors have different technical characteristics, including measurement error and noise.
“Various sensors have different technical characteristics, which also entail their specific state, e.g., the measurement error or the noise that a specific sensor presents.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Scripted datasets lack inter-subject and intra-subject variability.
“the inter-subject and intra-subject variability absent in such scripted datasets”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Detectable activities consist of simple and complex activities.
“Detectable activities consist of simple and complex activities.”
From Machine Learning Methods in Smart Lighting Toward Achieving User Comfort: A Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [333]
The deep learning technique, which employs numerous layers in the system, identifies ideal characteristics from raw data without the need for human interaction.
“The deep learning technique, which employs numerous layers in the system, identifies ideal characteristics from raw data without the need for human interaction [31].”
From Deep CNN-LSTM With Self-Attention Model for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensor (2022) · cites this paper as [31]
The deep learning model is typically treated as a black box, and the derived characteristics from the multi-layered approach may be difficult to understand, making algorithm improvement difficult.
“Second, the model is typically treated as a black box, and the derived characteristics from the multi-layered approach may be difficult to understand [31], making algorithm improvement difficult.”
From Deep CNN-LSTM With Self-Attention Model for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensor (2022) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Table VIII row 14 is described as both using and not using extracted features
MinorOne passage identifies row 14 as evidence of DL methods without feature extraction; the next says that row 14 uses both time- and frequency-domain features.
“the majority of them do not make use of any Noise Removal and Feature Extraction step as shown in Tab. VIII, rows 10 and 14.”
“other DL-based articles do make use of time-domain (Tab. VIII, row 12) features, frequency domain (Tab. VIII, row 11) and both time and frequency domain (Tab. VIII, rows 13 and 14) features.”
DL and classical-ML paper totals change between sections
MinorThe introduction assigns 53 papers to DL and 96 to classical ML, whereas the classification section assigns 54 and 95, respectively, to the same 149-paper review.
“among a total of 149 selected published papers on HAR, 53 were based on DL models, and 96 were based on CML models.”
“The DL models, as shown in Figure 1 comprised 54 papers of the 149 papers we reviewed.”
k-Means is placed in both learning categories
MinorThe machine-learning overview lists k-Means among supervised algorithms and later lists it among unsupervised algorithms.
“Some of the most common supervised CML algorithms are: Naïve Bayes (NB), k-Means Clustering, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, Random Forests (RF), Decision Trees (DT) and k-Nearest Neighbours (k-NN).”
“Among unsupervised and particularly clustering algorithms, the most well-known algorithms are k-Means, Hierarchical clustering, and Mixture models.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 221 · Cited by 368
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Brownlee, 2016, Master Machine Learning Algorithms: Discover How They Work and Implement Them From Scratch
- 2019, New Wearables Forecast From IDC Shows Smartwatches Continuing Their Ascendance While Wristbands Face Flat Growth
- Polu, 2018, Human activity recognition on smartphones using machine learning algorithms, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Technol., 5, 31
- Hossain, Improving activity recognition for missing data
- 2019, Active Miles
- Authors
- Demrozi, F., Pravadelli, G., Bihorac, A., & Rashidi, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- University of Florida (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 210816-210836
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7748247
- OpenAlex
- W3017181332
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 221
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 19.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIBIB 1R21EB027344, NSF CAREER 1750192)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, inertial sensors, physiological sensors, environmental sensors, wearable devices, smartphones, smartwatches, assistive technology, elderly monitoring, health monitoring, sports applications, multimodal sensor fusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review