Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medical Diagnostic Systems Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Algorithms: Principles and Perspectives

Open access
Kaur, Simarjeet, Singla, Jimmy, Nkenyereye, Lewis, Jha, Sudan, Prashar, Deepak, Joshi, Gyanendra Prasad, El-Sappagh, Shaker, Islam, Md. Saiful, Islam, S. M. Riazul·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

Disease diagnosis is the identification of an health issue, disease, disorder, or other condition that a person may have. Disease diagnoses could be sometimes very easy tasks, while others may be a bit trickier. There are large data sets available; however, there is a limitation of tools that can accurately determine the patterns and make predictions. The traditional methods which are used to diagnose a disease are manual and error-prone. Usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) predictive techniques enables auto diagnosis and reduces detection errors compared to exclusive human expertise. In this paper, we have reviewed the current literature for the last 10 years, from January 2009 to December 2019. The study considered eight most frequently used databases, in which a total of 105 articles were found. A detailed analysis of those articles was conducted in order to classify most used AI techniques for medical diagnostic systems. We further discuss various diseases along with corresponding techniques of AI, including Fuzzy Logic, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning. This research paper aims to reveal some important insights into current and previous different AI techniques in the medical field used in today’s medical research, particularly in heart disease prediction, brain disease, prostate, liver disease, and kidney disease. Finally, the paper also provides some avenues for future research on AI-based diagnostics systems based on a set of open problems and challenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3042273

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. swapna, 2018, Diabetes detection using deep learning algorithms, ICT Exp, 4, 243, 10.1016/j.icte.2018.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/ICOMET.2018.8346384 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.015 · DOI · Paper page
  4. shoieb, 2019, Computer-aided model for skin diagnosis using deep learning, J Image Graph, 4, 122
  5. miao, 2018, Coronary heart disease diagnosis using deep neural networks, Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl, 9, 1
  6. sun, 2016, Computer aided lung cancer diagnosis with deep learning algorithms, Proc SPIE, 9785
  7. 10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.122 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/ICAICT.2011.6110913 · doi:10.1109/icaict.2011.6110913
  9. rubin, 2017, Recognizing abnormal heart sounds using deep learning, arXiv 1707 04642
  10. 10.1109/ICICCT.2018.8473159 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TIE.2017.2764844 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.10.006 · DOI
  13. 10.5121/csit.2013.3218 · doi:10.5121/csit.2013.3218
  14. 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.014 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1109/ICCIC.2010.5705890 · doi:10.1109/iccic.2010.5705890
  16. 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.571 · DOI
  17. kalpana, 2011, Fuzzy expert system for diagnosis of diabetes using fuzzy determination mechanism, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2, 354
  18. satarkar, 2015, Fuzzy expert system for the diagnosis of common liver disease, Int J Eng Research & Development, 1, 2
  19. 10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. marsland, 2015, Machine Learning An Algorithmic Perspective
  21. 10.9790/2834-09136975 · doi:10.9790/2834-09136975
  22. kononenko, 1997, Application of machine learning to medical diagnosis, Mach Learning Data Mining Methods Appl, 389, 408
  23. 10.1016/j.imu.2015.12.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s12194-017-0406-5 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.01.005 · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.01.005
  26. 10.1007/978-3-642-13523-1_26 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00940 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt474 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1109/PDP.2014.115 · doi:10.1109/pdp.2014.115
  30. rana, 2013, Design of expert system for medical diagnosis using fuzzy logic, Int J Sci Eng Res, 4, 2914
  31. 10.4236/health.2010.23031 · doi:10.4236/health.2010.23031
  32. 10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00160-5 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1109/WICT.2011.6141450 · DOI
  35. braunwald, 1988, Heart Disease A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine
  36. sinha, 2015, Comparative study of chronic kidney disease prediction using KNN and SVM, International Journal of Engine Research, v4, 608
  37. 10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025242 · DOI · Paper page
  38. sriram, 2013, Intelligent Parkinson disease prediction using machine learning algorithms, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 3, 1568
  39. 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.182 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1109/CESYS.2017.8321150 · doi:10.1109/cesys.2017.8321150
  41. sinusas, 2012, Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and treatment, Amer Family Physician, 85, 49
  42. asri, 2016, Using machine learning algorithms for breast cancer risk prediction and diagnosis, Procedia Comput Sci, 83, 1064, 10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.224 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.044 · DOI · Paper page
  44. beale, 1996, Neural Network Design
  45. 10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.006 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.bspc.2017.07.005 · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2017.07.005
  47. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2694446 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1093/cid/cit185 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.005 · DOI
  51. 10.1128/CMR.00089-17 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1109/ICOS.2011.6079267 · doi:10.1109/icos.2011.6079267
  53. uzoka, 2011, A framework for cell phone based diagnosis and management of priority tropical diseases, Proc IST-Africa Conf, 1
  54. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.032 · DOI
  55. 10.1186/s12916-014-0265-4 · DOI · Paper page
  56. scheuermann, 2009, Toward an ontological treatment of disease and diagnosis, Summit on translational bioinformatics, 2009, 116
  57. 10.1109/21.52551 · DOI · Paper page
  58. choi, 2016, Doctor ai: Predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks, Proc Mach Learn Healthcare Conf, 301
  59. yen, 1999, Fuzzy Logic Intelligence Control and Information, 1
  60. 10.1016/j.fss.2015.09.001 · DOI
  61. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183389 · DOI
  62. 10.1109/ISCID.2009.43 · DOI
  63. jamgade, 2019, Disease prediction using machine learning, Int Res J Eng Technol, 6, 6937
  64. okpor, 2012, Using fuzzy classifier for cholera analysis, Int J Sci Res, 3, 314
  65. 10.5120/14252-1626 · doi:10.5120/14252-1626
  66. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3486-7_6 · DOI
  67. godil, 2011, Fuzzy logic: A ‘simple’ solution for complexities in neurosciences?, Surgical Neurology, 2, 24, 10.4103/2152-7806.77177 · DOI

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Kaur, S., Singla, J., Nkenyereye, L., Jha, S., Prashar, D., Joshi, G. P., El-Sappagh, S., Islam, M. S., & Islam, S. M. R.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
228049-228069
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108597174
Cited by
255
References
12
FWCI
14.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea grant
  • Korean Government, Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2020R1A2B5B02002478)
  • Sejong University through its Faculty Research Program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Diagnostic Systems Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Algorithms: Principles and Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.3042273
The paper
Kaur, S., Singla, J., Nkenyereye, L., Jha, S., Prashar, D., Joshi, G. P., El-Sappagh, S., Islam, M. S., & Islam, S. M. R. (2020). Medical Diagnostic Systems Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Algorithms: Principles and Perspectives. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3042273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.