Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Brain Disease Diagnosis: Principles and Recent Advances

Open access
Khan, Protima, Kader, Md. Fazlul, Islam, S. M. Riazul, Rahman, Aisha B., Kamal, Md. Shahriar, Toha, Masbah Uddin, Kwak, Kyung-Sup·2021·IEEE Access

Abstract

Brain is the controlling center of our body. With the advent of time, newer and newer brain diseases are being discovered. Thus, because of the variability of brain diseases, existing diagnosis or detection systems are becoming challenging and are still an open problem for research. Detection of brain diseases at an early stage can make a huge difference in attempting to cure them. In recent years, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) is surging through all spheres of science, and no doubt, it is revolutionizing the field of neurology. Application of AI in medical science has made brain disease prediction and detection more accurate and precise. In this study, we present a review on recent machine learning and deep learning approaches in detecting four brain diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), brain tumor, epilepsy, and Parkinson's disease. 147 recent articles on four brain diseases are reviewed considering diverse machine learning and deep learning approaches, modalities, datasets etc. Twenty-two datasets are discussed which are used most frequently in the reviewed articles as a primary source of brain disease data. Moreover, a brief overview of different feature extraction techniques that are used in diagnosing brain diseases is provided. Finally, key findings from the reviewed articles are summarized and a number of major issues related to machine learning/deep learning-based brain disease diagnostic approaches are discussed. Through this study, we aim at finding the most accurate technique for detecting different brain diseases which can be employed for future betterment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3062484

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 173 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Khan, P., Kader, M. F., Islam, S. M. R., Rahman, A. B., Kamal, M. S., Toha, M. U., & Kwak, K.-S.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
37622-37655
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133909080
Cited by
293
References
173
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Brain Disease Diagnosis: Principles and Recent Advances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2021.3062484
The paper
Khan, P., Kader, M. F., Islam, S. M. R., Rahman, A. B., Kamal, M. S., Toha, M. U., & Kwak, K.-S. (2021). Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Brain Disease Diagnosis: Principles and Recent Advances. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3062484

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.