Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning With Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Deep Neural Network

Open access
Lee, Joon-Woo, Kang, Hyungchul, Lee, Yongwoo, Choi, Woosuk, Eom, Jieun, Deryabin, Maxim, Lee, Eunsang, Lee, Junghyun, Yoo, Donghoon, Kim, Young-Sik, No, Jong-Seon·2022·IEEE Access

Abstract

Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) is a prospective tool for privacy-preserving machine learning (PPML). Several PPML models have been proposed based on various FHE schemes and approaches. Although FHE schemes are suitable as tools for implementing PPML models, previous PPML models based on FHE, such as CryptoNet, SEALion, and CryptoDL, are limited to simple and nonstandard types of machine learning models; they have not proven to be efficient and accurate with more practical and advanced datasets. Previous PPML schemes replaced non-arithmetic activation functions with simple arithmetic functions instead of adopting approximation methods and did not use bootstrapping, which enables continuous homomorphic evaluations. Thus, they could neither use standard activation functions nor employ large numbers of layers. In this work, we first implement the standard ResNet-20 model with the RNS-CKKS FHE with bootstrapping and verify the implemented model with the CIFAR-10 dataset and plaintext model parameters. Instead of replacing the non-arithmetic functions with simple arithmetic functions, we use state-of-the-art approximation methods to evaluate these non-arithmetic functions, such as ReLU and Softmax, with sufficient precision. Further, for the first time, we use the bootstrapping technique of the RNS-CKKS scheme in the proposed model, which enables us to evaluate an arbitrary deep learning model on encrypted data. We numerically verify that the proposed model with the CIFAR-10 dataset shows 98.43% identical results to the original ResNet-20 model with non-encrypted data. The classification accuracy of the proposed model is 92.43%±2.65%, which is quite close to that of the original ResNet-20 CNN model (91.89%). It takes approximately 3 h for inference on a dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 CPU (112 cores) with 172 GB of memory. We believe that this opens the possibility of applying FHE to an advanced deep PPML model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2022.3159694

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J.-W., Kang, H., Lee, Y., Choi, W., Eom, J., Deryabin, M., Lee, E., Lee, J., Yoo, D., Kim, Y.-S., & No, J.-S.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
30039-30054
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173128495
Cited by
414
References
33
FWCI
27.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning With Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Deep Neural Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2022.3159694
The paper
Lee, J.-W., Kang, H., Lee, Y., Choi, W., Eom, J., Deryabin, M., Lee, E., Lee, J., Yoo, D., Kim, Y.-S., & No, J.-S. (2022). Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning With Fully Homomorphic Encryption for Deep Neural Network. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3159694

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.