Cited by 38Cryptography and Data SecurityCryptographic Implementations and SecurityCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

FPT: A Fixed-Point Accelerator for Torus Fully Homomorphic Encryption

Open access
Van Beirendonck, Michiel, D'Anvers, Jan-Pieter, Turan, Furkan, Verbauwhede, Ingrid·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Abstract

Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) is a technique that allows computation on encrypted data. It has the potential to drastically change privacy considerations in the cloud, but high computational and memory overheads are preventing its broad adoption. TFHE is a promising Torus-based FHE scheme that heavily relies on bootstrapping, the noise-removal tool invoked after each encrypted logical/arithmetical operation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3576915.3623159

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ARMv8-A architecture exhibits comparable timing jitter profiles to x86 and Apple Silicon, ensuring consistent entropy yields across platforms.

    “Recent benchmarks confirm that the ARMv8-A architecture exhibit comparable timing jitter profiles to x86 and Apple Silicon24, ensuring consistent entropy yields across platforms.”

    From Raw QPP-RNG randomness via system jitter across platforms: a NIST SP 800-90B evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Evaluation and Comparison section benchmarks an FPGA accelerator, and Table 4 compares homomorphic-encryption bootstrapping performance across platforms; neither addresses timing jitter or entropy yields. Searches for ARMv8-A, x86, Apple Silicon, timing jitter, and cross-platform entropy found no relevant passage in our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Alfred V. Aho, John E. Hopcroft, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. 1974. The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Addison-Wesley.
  2. Jonathan Bachrach, Huy Vo, Brian C. Richards, Yunsup Lee, Andrew Water- man, Rimas Avizienis, John Wawrzynek, and Krste Asanovic. 2012. Chisel: constructing hardware in a Scala embedded language. In The 49th Annual Design Automation Conference 2012, DAC '12, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 3-7, 2012,
  3. Ilaria Chillotti, Marc Joye, Damien Ligier, Jean-Baptiste Orfila, and Samuel Tap. 2020. CONCRETE: Concrete operates on ciphertexts rapidly by extending TfhE. In WAHC 2020-8th Workshop on Encrypted Computing & Applied Homomorphic Cryptography, Vol. 15.
  4. Serhan Gener, Parker Newton, Daniel Tan, Silas Richelson, Guy Lemieux, and Philip Brisk. 2021. An FPGA-based Programmable Vector Engine for Fast Fully Homomorphic Encryption over the Torus. In SPSL: Secure and Private Systems for Machine Learning (ISCA Workshop).
  5. Torus. IACR Trans. Cryptogr. Hardw. Embed. Syst. 2022, 4 (2022), 661-692. https: //doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2022.i4.661-692 · DOI
  6. Ronald L Rivest, Len Adleman, Michael L Dertouzos, et al. 1978. On data banks and privacy homomorphisms. Foundations of secure computation 4, 11 (1978), 169-180.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Beirendonck, M., D'Anvers, J.-P., Turan, F., & Verbauwhede, I.
Affiliations
  • COSIC, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-11-15
Pages
741-755
ISSN
1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388857848
Cited by
38
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3
FWCI
6.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • FWO PhD Fellow (1SD5621N)
  • Research Council KU Leuven (C16/15/058)
  • Horizon 2020 ERC Advanced Grant (10102000)
  • FWO Post-Doctoral Fellow (133185)
  • CyberSecurity Research Flanders (VR20192203)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
fully homomorphic encryption, TFHE, bootstrapping, noise reduction, fixed-point arithmetic, hardware accelerators, cloud privacy, encrypted data processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review