Cited by 12Digital Transformation in IndustryAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesApplied Advanced Technologies

Development of Digital Twin for FDM Printer With Preventive Cyber-Attack and Control Algorithms

Open access
Hazrat Ali, Md, Waqar Malik, Asad, Jyeniskhan, Nursultan, Arif Mahmood, Muhammad, Shehab, Essam, Liou, Frank·2024·IEEE Access

Abstract

This paper presents a developed model of a Digital Twin (DT) for a fused deposition modeling (FDM) printer, real-time defect detection, and proposed frameworks for preventing cyber-attacks in real-time. It also highlights a model predictive control (MPC) algorithm based on a real-time feedback system for controlling the material feed. The system is designed and developed based on DT, and MPC with integrated machine learning (ML) algorithms to establish real-time process control and enhance the safety and reliability of the physical plant. ML algorithm is used for anomaly detection based on the convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The developed system can be practically utilized in smart manufacturing industries as well as cyber-physical systems-based plants. The work is novel and original as this type of DT and cyber-physical systems (CPS) are very new to additive manufacturing (AM) industries. There are several conceptual models in the literature and there is a critical need for such implemented working systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2024.3516827

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kim et al. [127] achieve real-time synchronization between the physical twin (PT) and digital twin (DT), collecting and analyzing control commands and sensor feedback simultaneously to detect cyber-physical anomalies in the printing process.

    “The authors achieve real-time synchronization between the physical twin (PT) and digital twin (DT), collecting and analyzing control commands and sensor feedback simultaneously to detect cyber-physical anomalies in the printing process.”
  • Kim et al. [127]'s dual control scheme integrated with a PLC stops the machine and restores it to a safe state when anomaly patterns are detected, realizing preventive control.

    “Furthermore, a dual control scheme integrated with a PLC stops the machine and restores it to a safe state when anomaly patterns are detected, realizing preventive control.”
  • Kim et al. [127]'s proposed model is trained and validated on the custom DT-PT dataset and represents a hybrid anomaly detection architecture that simultaneously exploits control, sensor, and process image data.

    “The proposed model is trained and validated on the custom DT-PT dataset and represents a hybrid anomaly detection architecture that simultaneously exploits control, sensor, and process image data.”
  • In Kim et al. [127]'s detection phase, DBSCAN-based clustering is combined with an EfficientDetLite deep model to identify nozzle position errors, temperature deviations, and vibration anomalies.

    “In the detection phase, DBSCAN-based clustering is combined with an EfficientDetLite deep model to identify nozzle position errors, temperature deviations, and vibration anomalies.”
  • Kim et al. [127] proposed a data fusion-based control algorithm that jointly performs cyberattack prevention and anomaly detection using an FDM 3D printer digital twin dataset constructed in-house.

    “Kim et al. [127] proposed a data fusion-based control algorithm that jointly performs cyberattack prevention and anomaly detection using an FDM 3D printer digital twin (DT) dataset constructed in-house.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hazrat Ali, M., Waqar Malik, A., Jyeniskhan, N., Arif Mahmood, M., Shehab, E., & Liou, F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences (SEDS), Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Strategic Planning and Analysis Research Center (NSPARC), Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
  • Intelligent Systems Center, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA
  • Nazarbayev University (KZ)
  • Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2024
Volume
12
Pages
193594-193606
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405755418
Cited by
12
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Nazarbayev University through the Faculty Development Competitive Research Grant Program (11022021FD2904)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Applied Advanced Technologies
Keywords
digital twin, fused deposition modeling, 3D printer, cyberattack prevention, model predictive control, real-time defect detection, convolutional neural networks, anomaly detection, cyber-physical systems, additive manufacturing, smart manufacturing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review