Cited by 7Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesUsability and User Interface DesignAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Approach to Low-fidelity Prototyping Based on SOFL Informal Specification

Zainuddin, Fauziah Binti, Liu, Shaoying·2012·2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference

Abstract

Low-fidelity prototyping has been increasingly adopted in software development to facilitate the communication between the developer and the end-user, since it can be simply realised without the need for programming. However, this technique is not mature enough as it lacks a systematic approach to build prototypes and capture user feedback. In this paper, we present a method that provides a systematic way to build low-fidelity prototypes from informal specifications and to collect user feedback for completing or refining the requirements. Three steps are essential for this method. The first step is to derive implementation architecture of the prototype from the specification by determining the design properties of the required functions and to define their relationships. The second step is to construct the prototype based on the architecture using the animation tool in Microsoft PowerPoint. The third step is to gather user's feedback using specific forms during low-fidelity prototyping. We have applied this method to the development of a web-based Travel Agent System. The result shows that our approach is effective in ensuring the quality and efficiency of communication and software requirements, although it still has room for further improvement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/apsec.2012.132

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interactive computer-based mock-ups yielded more feedback when used for user testing.

    “Furthermore, Liu and Khooshabeh also found that interactive computer-based mock-ups yielded more feedback when used for user testing.”
  • Paper sketches provide more flexibility for designers in early stages, but require more effort to use with larger sets of users.

    “They found that while paper sketches provide more flexibility for designers in early stages, this kind of prototype media requires more effort to use with larger sets of users, e.g., to manually simulate interaction.”
  • The cost of producing prototypes, the gains and types of learning that can be obtained from these varies with the media.

    “While there is a correspondence between different kinds of prototype media and the scope of these, the cost of producing prototypes, the gains and types of learning that can be obtain from these varies with the media (McCurdy et al. 2006;Zainuddin and Liu 2012).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. zheng, 0, PowerPoint Prototyping Toolkit (Release 0 2)
  2. 10.1145/1753846.1754077 · DOI
  3. 0, Khella Productions Inc
  4. kujala, 2002, User studies: A practical approach to user involvement for gathering user needs and requirements, Acta Polytech Sc Ma, 1
  5. jordan, 0, 10 Minute Mock Prototyping-Tips for PowerPoint
  6. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494187 · DOI
  7. hao-ran, 0, A new steganography method via combination in PowerPoint files, Proc 2010 Int Conf Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), 62
  8. 10.1109/VLHCC.2008.4639064 · DOI
  9. lin, 2000, Denim: Finding a tighter fit between tools and practice for web site design, Proc SIGCHI Conf Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00) New York NY, 510, 10.1145/332040.332486 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/ICSTW.2010.35 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/1375761.1375762 · DOI · Paper page
  12. belhajjame, 2011, User feedback as a first class citizen in information integration systems, Proc 5th Biennial Conf Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR'11) Asilomar CA, 175
  13. 10.1145/1378063.1378137 · DOI · Paper page
  14. nguyen, 2007, User interface design pattern management system support for building information system, Proc 1st Int IEEE Conf Digital Information Management, 99
  15. 10.1145/223500.223514 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1145/765891.765986 · DOI · Paper page
  17. kujala, 2003, User Involvement A Review of Benefits and Challenges, 1
  18. liu, 1998, Applying sofl to specify a railway crossing controller for industry, Proc 2nd IEEE Workshop Digital Object Identifier-Industrial Strength Formal Specification Techniques, 16
  19. 10.1007/978-3-642-24559-6_13 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/978-3-662-07287-5 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/238386.238516 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/014492996120049 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zainuddin, F. B., & Liu, S.
Affiliations
Hosei University (JP)
Venue
2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-12
Pages
654-663
ISSN
1530-1362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030997156
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
low-fidelity prototyping, informal specification, SOFL, user feedback collection, requirements refinement, PowerPoint animation, user-developer communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review