Cited by 81Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

A Comparison of Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models for Multimodal Representation Learning across Medical Images and Reports

Open access
Li, Yikuan, Wang, Hanyin, Luo, Yuan·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)

Abstract

Joint image-text embedding extracted from medical images and associated contextual reports is the bedrock for most biomedical vision-and-language (V+L) tasks, including medical visual question answering, clinical image-text retrieval, clinical report auto-generation. In this study, we adopt four pre-trained V+L models: LXMERT, VisualBERT, UNIER and PixelBERT to learn multimodal representation from MIMIC-CXR images and associated reports. External evaluation using the OpenI dataset shows that the joint embedding learned by pre-trained V+L models demonstrates performance improvement of 1.4% in thoracic finding classification tasks compared to a pioneering CNN+RNN model. Ablation studies are conducted to further analyze the contribution of certain model components and validate the advantage of joint embedding over text-only embedding. Attention maps are also visualized to illustrate the attention mechanism of V+L models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bibm49941.2020.9313289

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More modalities are emerging beyond vision, text, and audio.

    “More modalities.In addition to the general modalities of vision, text, and audio, further diverse modalities are emerging, e.g., Pano-AVQA [144] -the first large-scale spatial and audio-visual question answering dataset on 360 • videos, YouTube-360 (YT-360) [145] (360 • videos), AIST++ [146] (a new multimodal dataset of 3D dance motion and music), Artemis [147] (affective language for visual arts)”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [146]

  • A common practice for hierarchical attention (multi-stream to one-stream) is independent Transformer streams whose outputs are concatenated and fused by another Transformer.

    “A common practice is that multimodal inputs are encoded by independent Transformer streams and their outputs are concatenated and fused by another Transformer [146]”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [146]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Wang, H., & Luo, Y.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-12-16
Pages
1999-2004
OpenAlex
W3128510757
Cited by
81
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
vision-language models, multimodal representation learning, pre-trained models, LXMERT, chest X-ray reports, MIMIC-CXR, attention maps, medical report generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review