PreprintCited by 1,198Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Language

Open access
Li, Liunian Harold, Yatskar, Mark, Yin, Da, Hsieh, Cho-Jui, Chang, Kai-Wei·2019·arXiv

Abstract

We propose VisualBERT, a simple and flexible framework for modeling a broad range of vision-and-language tasks. VisualBERT consists of a stack of Transformer layers that implicitly align elements of an input text and regions in an associated input image with self-attention. We further propose two visually-grounded language model objectives for pre-training VisualBERT on image caption data. Experiments on four vision-and-language tasks including VQA, VCR, NLVR2, and Flickr30K show that VisualBERT outperforms or rivals with state-of-the-art models while being significantly simpler. Further analysis demonstrates that VisualBERT can ground elements of language to image regions without any explicit supervision and is even sensitive to syntactic relationships, tracking, for example, associations between verbs and image regions corresponding to their arguments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1908.03557

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attempts to build a single model for a suite of multimodal tasks are limited to the language and vision space, and multimodal training is highly tailored for text and images.

    “However, these are limited to the language and vision space, and multimodal training is highly tailored for text and images.”
  • There have been several attempts to build a single model that works well on a suite of multimodal tasks.

    “There have also been several attempts to build a single model that works well on a suite of multimodal tasks [95, 109, 143].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Peter Anderson, Xiaodong He, Chris Buehler, Damien Teney, Mark Johnson, Stephen Gould, and Lei Zhang. Bottom-up and top-down attention for image captioning and visual question answering. In CVPR , 2018.
  2. Remi Cadene, Hedi Ben-Younes, Matthieu Cord, and Nicolas Thome. MUREL: Multimodal relational reasoning for visual question answering. In CVPR , 2019.
  3. Xinlei Chen, Hao Fang, Tsung-Yi Lin, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Saurabh Gupta, Piotr Doll´ ar, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft COCO captions: Data collection and evaluation server. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.00325 , 2015. · arXiv
  4. Timothy Dozat and Christopher D Manning. Deep biaffine attention for neural dependency parsing. ICLR , 2017.
  5. Matt Gardner, Joel Grus, Mark Neumann, Oyvind Tafjord, Pradeep Dasigi, Nelson F Liu, Matthew Peters, Michael Schmitz, and Luke Zettlemoyer. AllenNLP: A deep semantic natural language processing platform. In Proceedings of Workshop for NLP Open Source Software (NLP-OSS) , 2018.
  6. Yash Goyal, Tejas Khot, Douglas Summers-Stay, Dhruv Batra, and Devi Parikh. Making the V in VQAmatter: Elevating the role of image understanding in Visual Question Answering. In CVPR , 2017.
  7. Yu Jiang, Vivek Natarajan, Xinlei Chen, Marcus Rohrbach, Dhruv Batra, and Devi Parikh. Pythia v0. 1: the winning entry to the VQA challenge 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09956 , 2018. · arXiv
  8. Lu Jiasen, Batra Dhruv, Parikh Devi, and Lee Lee. ViLBERT: Pretraining task-agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.02265 , 2019. · arXiv
  9. Justin Johnson, Ranjay Krishna, Michael Stark, Li-Jia Li, David Shamma, Michael Bernstein, and Li Fei-Fei. Image retrieval using scene graphs. In CVPR , 2015.
  10. Sahar Kazemzadeh, Vicente Ordonez, Mark Matten, and Tamara Berg. ReferItGame: Referring to objects in photographs of natural scenes. In EMNLP , 2014.
  11. Jin-Hwa Kim, Jaehyun Jun, and Byoung-Tak Zhang. Bilinear attention networks. In NeurIPS , 2018.
  12. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. ICLR , 2015.
  13. Linjie Li, Zhe Gan, Yu Cheng, and Jingjing Liu. Relation-aware graph attention network for visual question answering. ArXiv , abs/1903.12314, 2019. · arXiv
  14. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll´ ar, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context. In ECCV , 2014.
  15. Will Norcliffe-Brown, Stathis Vafeias, and Sarah Parisot. Learning conditioned graph structures for interpretable visual question answering. In NeurIPS , 2018.
  16. Bryan A Plummer, Liwei Wang, Chris M Cervantes, Juan C Caicedo, Julia Hockenmaier, and Svetlana Lazebnik. Flickr30k entities: Collecting region-to-phrase correspondences for richer imageto-sentence models. In ICCV , 2015.
  17. Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In NeurIPS , 2015.
  18. Adam Santoro, David Raposo, David G Barrett, Mateusz Malinowski, Razvan Pascanu, Peter Battaglia, and Timothy Lillicrap. A simple neural network module for relational reasoning. In NeurIPS , 2017.
  19. Piyush Sharma, Nan Ding, Sebastian Goodman, and Radu Soricut. Conceptual Captions: A cleaned, hypernymed, image alt-text dataset for automatic image captioning. In ACL , 2018.
  20. Amanpreet Singh, Vivek Natarajan, Meet Shah, Yu Jiang, Xinlei Chen, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh, and Marcus Rohrbach. Towards VQA models that can read. In CVPR , 2019.
  21. Alane Suhr, Stephanie Zhou, Iris Zhang, Huajun Bai, and Yoav Artzi. A corpus for reasoning about natural language grounded in photographs. ACL , 2019.
  22. Chen Sun, Austin Myers, Carl Vondrick, Kevin Murphy, and Cordelia Schmid. VideoBert: A joint model for video and language representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01766 , 2019. · arXiv
  23. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In NeurIPS , 2017.
  24. Elena Voita, David Talbot, Fedor Moiseev, Rico Sennrich, and Ivan Titov. Analyzing multi-head self-attention: Specialized heads do the heavy lifting, the rest can be pruned. ACL , 2019.
  25. Yonghui Wu, Mike Schuster, Zhifeng Chen, Quoc V Le, Mohammad Norouzi, Wolfgang Macherey, Maxim Krikun, Yuan Cao, Qin Gao, Klaus Macherey, et al. Google's neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144 , 2016. · arXiv
  26. Zichao Yang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, and Alex Smola. Stacked attention networks for image question answering. In CVPR , 2016.
  27. Jun Yu, Jing Li, Zhou Yu, and Qingming Huang. Multimodal transformer with multi-view visual representation for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.07841 , 2019a. · arXiv
  28. Zhou Yu, Jun Yu, Yuhao Cui, Dacheng Tao, and Qi Tian. Deep modular co-attention networks for visual question answering. In CVPR , 2019b.
  29. Rowan Zellers, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi. From recognition to cognition: Visual commonsense reasoning. In CVPR , 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L. H., Yatskar, M., Yin, D., Hsieh, C.-J., & Chang, K.-W.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968124245
Cited by
1,198
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 206 · 2023: 288 · 2022: 216 · 2021: 256 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
vision-language pre-training, image captioning, visual grounding, self-attention, visual question answering, visual commonsense reasoning, Flickr30k, syntactic relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review