Cited by 18Machine Learning in HealthcareBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesTopic Modeling

Zero-shot Learning with Minimum Instruction to Extract Social Determinants and Family History from Clinical Notes using GPT Model

Open access
Bhate, Neel Jitesh, Mittal, Ansh, He, Zhe, Luo, Xiao·2023·2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)

Abstract

Demographics, social determinants of health, and family history documented in the unstructured text within the electronic health records are increasingly being studied to understand how this information can be utilized with the structured data to improve healthcare outcomes. After the GPT models were released, many studies have applied GPT models to extract this information from the narrative clinical notes. Different from the existing work, our research focuses on investigating the zero-shot learning on extracting this information together by providing minimum information to the GPT model. We utilize de-identified real-world clinical notes annotated for demographics, various social determinants, and family history information. Given that the GPT model might provide text different from the text in the original data, we explore two sets of evaluation metrics, including the traditional NER evaluation metrics and semantic similarity evaluation metrics, to completely understand the performance. Our results show that the GPT-3.5 method achieved an average of 0.975 F1 on demographics extraction, 0.615 F1 on social determinants extraction, and 0.722 F1 on family history extraction. We believe these results can be further improved through model fine-tuning or few-shots learning. Through the case studies, we also identified the limitations of the GPT models, which need to be addressed in future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386811

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent natural language processing (NLP)-based methods, particularly LLMs like GPT-4, have shown success in capturing SDoH information from unstructured clinical notes and patient narratives, yielding tangible benefits for patient outcomes.

    “More recent natural language processing (NLP)-based methods, particularly LLMs like GPT-4, have also shown success in capturing SDoH information from unstructured clinical notes and patient narratives, yielding tangible benefits for patient outcomes [78,79].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Jain Siddhartha, Ma Xiaofei, Deoras Anoop, and Xiang Bing. Self-consistency for open-ended generations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06857, 2023. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhate, N. J., Mittal, A., He, Z., & Luo, X.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-12-15
Volume
2023
Pages
1476-1480
OpenAlex
W4391093878
Cited by
18
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5
FWCI
3.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
zero-shot learning, GPT models, social determinants of health, clinical notes, clinical text, named entity recognition, electronic health records, GPT-3.5

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review