Cited by 291Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsSoft Robotics and ApplicationsRetinal and Macular Surgery

New steady-hand Eye Robot with micro-force sensing for vitreoretinal surgery

Open access
Uneri, Ali, Balicki, Marcin A., Handa, James, Gehlbach, Peter, Taylor, Russell H., Iordachita, Iulian·2010·2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics

Abstract

In retinal microsurgery, surgeons are required to perform micron scale maneuvers while safely applying forces to the retinal tissue that are below sensory perception. Real-time characterization and precise manipulation of this delicate tissue has thus far been hindered by human limits on tool control and the lack of a surgically compatible endpoint sensing instrument. Here we present the design of a new generation, cooperatively controlled microsurgery robot with a remote center-of-motion (RCM) mechanism and an integrated custom micro-force sensing surgical hook. Utilizing the forces measured by the end effector, we correct for tool deflections and implement a micro-force guided cooperative control algorithm to actively guide the operator. Preliminary experiments have been carried out to test our new control methods on raw chicken egg inner shell membranes and to capture useful dynamic characteristics associated with delicate tissue manipulations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/biorob.2010.5625991

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unintentional tool motion and excessive forces during membrane peeling can cause vision loss or irreversible retinal damage.

    “unintentional tool motion and excessive forces can easily give rise to vision loss or irreversible damage to the retina”

    From Preliminary evaluation of a micro-force sensing handheld robot for vitreoretinal surgery (2012) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links hand tremor and other sources of imprecise tool motion, along with excessive retinal forces, to surgical complications that may cause vision loss. Methods §III.C (page unavailable) also links excessive or incorrectly applied forces to complications. Our copy does not specifically establish irreversible retinal damage or characterize these outcomes as occurring easily. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Guthart G Salisbury J.K J The intuitive telesurgery system: overview and application IEEE ICRA 2000 vol. 1 618 621
  2. [15]Vagvolgyi B DiMaio S Deguet A Kazanzides P Kumar R Hasser C Taylor R The Surgical Assistant Workstation: a software framework for telesurgical robotics research MICCAI Workshop on Systems and Architectures for Computer Assisted Interventions 2008 Sep Midas Journal: http://hdl.handle.net/10380/1466

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uneri, A., Balicki, M. A., Handa, J., Gehlbach, P., Taylor, R. H., & Iordachita, I.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-09
Volume
2010
Issue
26-29
Pages
814-819
ISSN
2155-1774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170514420
Cited by
291
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
49.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB007969)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
Keywords
vitrectomy, retinal microsurgery, surgical robots, remote center of motion, cooperative control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review