Cited by 43Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCloud Data Security SolutionsCloud Computing and Resource Management

A MapReduce Based Approach of Scalable Multidimensional Anonymization for Big Data Privacy Preservation on Cloud

Zhang, Xuyun, Yang, Chi, Nepal, Surya, Liu, Chang, Dou, Wanchun, Chen, Jinjun·2013·2013 International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing

Abstract

The massive increase in computing power and data storage capacity provisioned by cloud computing as well as advances in big data mining and analytics have expanded the scope of information available to businesses, government, and individuals by orders of magnitude. Meanwhile, privacy protection is one of most concerned issues in big data and cloud applications, thereby requiring strong preservation of customer privacy and attracting considerable attention from both IT industry and academia. Data anonymization provides an effective way for data privacy preservation, and multidimensional anonymization scheme is a widely-adopted one among existing anonymization schemes. However, existing multidimensional anonymization approaches suffer from severe scalability or IT cost issues when handling big data due to their incapability of fully leveraging cloud resources or being cost-effectively adapted to cloud environments. As such, we propose a scalable multidimensional anonymization approach for big data privacy preservation using Map Reduce on cloud. In the approach, a highly scalable median-finding algorithm combining the idea of the median of medians and histogram technique is proposed and the recursion granularity is controlled to achieve cost-effectiveness. Corresponding MapReduce jobs are dedicatedly designed, and the experiment evaluations demonstrate that with our approach, the scalability and cost-effectiveness of multidimensional scheme can be improved significantly over existing approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cgc.2013.24

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Yang, C., Nepal, S., Liu, C., Dou, W., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • State Key Laboratory of New Technology of Computer Software (CN)
Venue
2013 International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-09
Pages
105-112
OpenAlex
W1998654583
Cited by
43
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7
FWCI
2.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
data anonymization, big data privacy, cloud computing, MapReduce, scalability, cost-effectiveness, privacy preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review