Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sentiment Analysis Using Convolutional Neural Network

Ouyang, Xi, Zhou, Pan, Li, Cheng Hua, Liu, Lijun·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing

Abstract

Sentiment analysis of text content is important for many natural language processing tasks. Especially, as the development of the social media, there is a big need in dig meaningful information from the big data on Internet through the sentiment analysis. Inspired by the successes of deep learning, we are interested in handling the sentiment analysis task using deep learning models. In this paper, we propose a framework called Word2vec + Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Firstly, we use the word2vec proposed by Google to compute vector representations of words, which will be the input for the CNN. The purpose of using word2vec is to gain the vector representation of word and reflect the distance of words. That will lead to initialize the parameters at a good point of CNN, which can efficiently improve the performance of the nets in this problem. Secondly, we design a suitable CNN architecture for the sentiment analysis task. We use 3 pairs of convolutional layers and pooling layers in this architecture. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a 7-layers architecture model is applied using word2vec and CNN to analyze sentences' sentiment. We also use the Parametric Rectified Linear Unit (PReLU), Normalization and Dropout technology to improve the accuracy and generalizability of our model. We test our framework in a public dataset which is the corpus of movie review excerpts that includes fives labels: negative, somewhat negative, neural, somewhat positive and positive. Our network achieves test accuracy of 45.4% in this dataset, which is a better performance than some other neural network model like Recursive Neural Network (RNN) and Matrix-Vector Recursive Neural Network (MV-RNN).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cit/iucc/dasc/picom.2015.349

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Ouyang, X., Zhou, P., Li, C. H., & Liu, L.
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-10
Pages
2359-2364
OpenAlex
W2215041843
Cited by
239
References
7
FWCI
3.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentiment Analysis Using Convolutional Neural Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cit/iucc/dasc/picom.2015.349
The paper
Ouyang, X., Zhou, P., Li, C. H., & Liu, L. (2015). Sentiment Analysis Using Convolutional Neural Network. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/cit/iucc/dasc/picom.2015.349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.