CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 100IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AIAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Realizing an Internet of Secure Things: A Survey on Issues and Enabling Technologies

Hamad, Salma Abdalla, Sheng, Quan Z., Zhang, Wei Emma, Nepal, Surya·2020·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
DOI 10.1109/comst.2020.2976075
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since the term first coined in 1999, the Internet of Things (IoT) has gained significant momentum in connecting physical objects to the Internet and facilitating machine-to-human and machine-to-machine communications. By offering the capability to connect and integrate both digital and physical entities, IoT becomes an important paradigm that enables a whole new class of applications and services. Security is one of the most challenging issues that need to be addressed before these IoT applications and services can be fully embraced. In this survey, we investigate the major research efforts over the period of 2013-2019 that address IoT security and privacy issues. We provide extensive discussions on securing cloud-based IoT solutions. The main focus of these discussions is on securing the information in transit between IoT devices and IoT applications, where most of the data processing and modelling tasks take place. These discussions include all security aspects and challenges facing the data in transit. Specifically, a number of common attacks that target IoT solutions are first discussed, while presenting the main challenges of IoT security (e.g., the resource limitation of IoT devices, which hinder the ability of such devices to do expensive computations for securing the data). Then we present the main security requirements needed by IoT systems, which include access control, integrity, and authentication. We review recent research work in providing security and privacy s…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2020.2976075

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hamad et al. [8] investigated main research work on addressing IoT security and privacy issues from 2013 to 2019, discussed common attacks, introduced security requirements, and reviewed research on delegating expensive computing to edge or cloud.

    “Hamad et al. [8] investigated the main research work on addressing IoT security and privacy issues from 2013 to 2019, discussed some common attacks against IoT solutions, introduced the main security requirements required for IoT systems, reviewed recent research on providing security and privacy services that delegate expensive computing to the edge or cloud to address low computing limitations”

    From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 171

  1. 10.1109/GIOTS.2017.8016281 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/TIT.1985.1057074 · DOI · Paper page
  3. zhou, 2012, Efficient and secure data storage operations for mobile cloud computing, Proc Int?l Conf Network and Service Management (CNSM), 37
  4. 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1700154 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/2991079.2991127 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730675 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/MC.2016.57 · DOI
  8. 10.1145/3298981 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600679 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TrustCom/BigDataSE.2019.00023 · DOI
  11. zolanvari, 2015, IoT security: A survey, Recent Advances in Networking (Data Center Virtualization SDN Big Data Internet of Things), 1
  12. 10.1109/TC.2014.2315619 · DOI
  13. 10.3390/s16071069 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/COMST.2015.2388550 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600363CM · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.dcan.2017.04.003 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2694844 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jisa.2017.11.002 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.11.025 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/ICNETS2.2017.8067900 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2011.5940923 · DOI
  25. cashdollar, 2019, As We Warned Iran Strikes Back With New Silex Malware Bricking IoT Devices
  26. 10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.05.021 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/INFCOM.2013.6567070 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jcss.2014.12.021 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/978-3-642-32946-3_17 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2615180 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TIFS.2015.2512525 · DOI
  32. 10.3390/jsan8030042 · DOI
  33. green, 2011, Outsourcing the decryption of ABE ciphertexts, Proc Adv Comput Syst Assoc Conf Security (USENIX SECURITY), 34
  34. 10.1109/INDS.2014.19 · DOI
  35. asim, 2014, Attribute-based encryption with encryption and decryption outsourcing, Proc Aust Inf Security Manag Conf (ISM), 21
  36. yong, 2013, Outsourced decryption scheme supporting attribute revocation, J Tsinghua Univ Sci Technol, 53, 1664
  37. 10.1145/1127345.1127346 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1109/INCoS.2013.103 · DOI
  39. 10.1145/1533057.1533094 · DOI
  40. 10.1109/TPDS.2013.284 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.csi.2016.05.002 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s12652-017-0658-2 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/BFb0054122 · DOI
  44. 10.3390/fi11030070 · DOI
  45. 10.1109/COMST.2014.2339817 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.future.2014.10.014 · DOI
  47. 10.1109/INFCOMW.2011.5928953 · DOI
  48. 10.1109/TPDS.2014.2314119 · DOI
  49. arrowood, 2013, Integrity of the healthcare record: Best practices for EHR documentation (2013 update), J Amer Health Inf Manage Assoc, 84, 58
  50. 10.1145/1952982.1952992 · DOI
  51. 2017, HIMSS Cybersecurity Survey
  52. 10.1109/VTCFall.2016.7881177 · DOI
  53. 10.1145/2903150.2911710 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/sec.795 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6309-2_12 · DOI
  56. roy, 2019, QoS-aware secure transaction framework for Internet of Things using blockchain mechanism, J Netw Comput Appl, 144, 59, 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.014 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/978-3-319-95450-9_3 · DOI
  58. nakamoto, 2008, Bitcoin A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
  59. 2018, What Are Message Authentication Codes
  60. 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.3390/s17071482 · DOI
  62. 10.6028/NIST.IR.8114 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1145/3013520 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s11280-017-0473-x · DOI
  65. 2019, New/Popular 8-Bit Microcontrollers Products—Microchip Technology Inc
  66. 10.1007/s11235-018-0530-5 · DOI
  67. 2019, COP8CCE9 8-Bit CMOS Flash Microcontroller With 8k Memory Virtual EEPROM 10-Bit A/D and 4 17V to 4 5V Brown
  68. 10.1007/978-981-10-2053-7_47 · DOI
  69. 10.1109/CSE-EUC.2017.103 · DOI
  70. 10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622050 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/978-3-319-40253-6_3 · DOI
  72. 10.1109/TDSC.2015.2496211 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/978-3-319-72389-1_28 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.024 · DOI
  75. zhang, 2016, Anonymous attribute-based proxy re-encryption for access control in cloud computing, Networks, 9, 2397
  76. 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525606 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070277 · DOI
  78. 10.1007/978-3-540-24632-9_14 · DOI
  79. 10.1145/501983.502013 · DOI
  80. melchor, 2011, A new efficient threshold ring signature scheme based on coding theory, IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 57, 1
  81. 10.1007/978-3-540-71677-8_12 · DOI
  82. 10.1007/11426639_7 · DOI
  83. 10.1007/3-540-44647-8_13 · DOI
  84. 10.3390/s19020327 · DOI
  85. 10.1109/FPT.2017.8280130 · DOI
  86. 10.1007/978-3-642-13013-7_27 · DOI
  87. 10.1007/978-3-540-74735-2_23 · DOI
  88. 10.1145/2897845.2897879 · DOI
  89. 10.17487/rfc1321 · DOI
  90. 10.1109/TDSC.2015.2445760 · DOI
  91. 10.1007/11761679_27 · DOI
  92. 10.1007/978-3-642-11799-2_27 · DOI
  93. 10.1145/2414456.2414505 · DOI
  94. 10.1109/ICDCS.2013.60 · DOI
  95. mehuron, 2008, The Keyed-Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC) Category Computer Security Subcategory Cryptography
  96. 10.1007/11426639_27 · DOI
  97. 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.180-4 · DOI
  98. 10.1145/1180405.1180418 · DOI
  99. gaetani, 2017, Blockchain-based database to ensure data integrity in cloud computing environments, Proc CEUR Workshop, 146
  100. 10.1016/j.ins.2013.04.028 · DOI
  101. moinet, 2017, Blockchain based trust & authentication for decentralized sensor networks[J]
  102. 10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170858 · DOI
  103. 10.1007/s00607-014-0393-x · DOI
  104. 10.1109/CloudCom2018.2018.00060 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.jcss.2014.12.016 · DOI
  106. ogundoyin, 2018, An autonomous lightweight conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme with provable security for vehicular ad-hoc networks, Int J Comput Appl, 42, 196
  107. li, 2015, ACPN: A novel authentication framework with conditional privacy-preservation and non-repudiation for VANETs, IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst, 26, 938, 10.1109/TPDS.2014.2308215 · DOI
  108. 10.1007/978-3-319-11212-1_5 · DOI
  109. 10.1007/3-540-44586-2_28 · DOI
  110. 10.5220/0006129600710082 · DOI
  111. 10.1007/978-3-540-24660-2_12 · DOI
  112. 10.3390/s150715611 · DOI
  113. 10.1145/1536414.1536440 · DOI · Paper page
  114. 10.1109/INFCOM.2010.5462174 · DOI
  115. 10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_25 · DOI
  116. 10.1145/3079763 · DOI
  117. 10.1007/978-3-642-22792-9_9 · DOI
  118. 10.23919/ICACT.2017.7890183 · DOI
  119. 10.1109/MC.2008.386 · DOI
  120. gentry, 2011, Implementing gentry’s fully-homomorphic encryption scheme, Proc Int Conf Theory Appl Cryptograph Techn (EUROCRYPT), 129
  121. sheng, 2017, Managing the Web of Things Linking the Real World to the Web
  122. 10.1007/978-3-642-02384-2_13 · DOI
  123. 10.1007/978-3-642-33272-2_5 · DOI
  124. maji, 2008, Attribute-based signatures: Achieving attribute-privacy and collusion-resistance, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 1
  125. 10.1504/IJACT.2012.045589 · DOI
  126. 10.1145/1755688.1755697 · DOI
  127. 10.1007/BFb0052234 · DOI
  128. 10.1007/3-540-44987-6_7 · DOI · Paper page
  129. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2854600 · DOI
  130. chaum, 1982, Blind signatures for untraceable payments, Proc Int Conf Theory Appl Cryptograph Techn, 199
  131. 10.5220/0006469202120225 · DOI
  132. li, 2011, Identity-based cryptography for cloud security, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 169, 1
  133. 10.1007/978-3-319-66399-9_29 · DOI
  134. anjaneyulu, 2008, Secured digital signature scheme using polynomials over non-commutative division semirings, Int J Comput Sci Netw Security, 8, 278
  135. 10.1007/3-540-39568-7_5 · DOI
  136. 10.1016/j.future.2014.12.001 · DOI
  137. 10.1007/978-3-319-45744-4_14 · DOI
  138. 10.1007/978-3-642-19074-2_24 · DOI
  139. 10.1002/dac.3322 · DOI
  140. 10.1145/2484313.2484381 · DOI
  141. 10.1007/978-3-319-12475-9_19 · DOI
  142. 10.1007/s10207-015-0289-6 · DOI
  143. 2019, Mbed
  144. 2019, Brillo Internet of Things OS—Intraway
  145. 2019, Ubuntu Core
  146. 10.1109/LCN.2009.5355049 · DOI
  147. 2019, Contiki-NG
  148. 2017, Kaspersky Embedded Security Solutions Secure OS for the Internet of Things Technical Report
  149. khader, 2007, Attribute based group signature with revocation, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 241
  150. mcbride, 2018, Security analysis of Contiki IoT operating system, Proc Int Conf Embedded Wireless Syst Netw, 278
  151. 10.1109/TPDS.2010.203 · DOI
  152. 10.1007/3-540-46416-6_22 · DOI
  153. ii, 2018, Survey on IoT security issues and security protocols, Int J Comput Appl, 180, 975
  154. 10.1145/1866835.1866845 · DOI · Paper page
  155. maggi, 2018, When Machines Can’t Talk Security and Privacy Issues of Machine-to-Machine Data Protocols
  156. zhang, 2014, Attribute-based data sharing with flexible and direct revocation in cloud computing, KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst, 8, 4028
  157. 10.1007/3-540-48658-5_19 · DOI
  158. lundgren, 2017, Taking Over the World Through MQTT-AfterMath
  159. 10.1007/978-3-642-40084-1_27 · DOI
  160. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2801266 · DOI · Paper page
  161. guo, 2008, Attribute-based signature scheme, Proc IEEE Int Conf Inf Secur Assurance (ISA), 509
  162. 10.1109/SP.2007.11 · DOI · Paper page
  163. yang, 2008, Fuzzy identity based signature, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2008, 2
  164. 10.1007/978-3-319-40253-6_27 · DOI
  165. 10.1007/3-540-36178-2_33 · DOI
  166. 10.1145/1128817.1128861 · DOI
  167. 10.1007/978-3-540-73420-8_38 · DOI
  168. 10.1007/978-3-319-12475-9_18 · DOI
  169. 10.1007/978-3-642-54631-0_17 · DOI
  170. 10.1109/TC.2015.2510646 · DOI
  171. 10.1109/TC.2015.2419662 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hamad, S. A., Sheng, Q. Z., Zhang, W. E., & Nepal, S.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2020
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
1372-1391
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
DOI
10.1109/comst.2020.2976075
OpenAlex
W3006696868
Cited by
100
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 7
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT140101247)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
Keywords
Internet of Things security, IoT privacy, cloud-based IoT, IoT attacks, resource-constrained IoT devices, access control, data integrity, authentication, edge computing, security requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review