The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semantic segmentation using regions and parts
Abstract
We address the problem of segmenting and recognizing objects in real world images, focusing on challenging articulated categories such as humans and other animals. For this purpose, we propose a novel design for region-based object detectors that integrates efficiently top-down information from scanning-windows part models and global appearance cues. Our detectors produce class-specific scores for bottom-up regions, and then aggregate the votes of multiple overlapping candidates through pixel classification. We evaluate our approach on the PASCAL segmentation challenge, and report competitive performance with respect to current leading techniques. On VOC2010, our method obtains the best results in 6/20 categories and the highest performance on articulated objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
Ensemble of exemplar-SVMs for object detection and beyond
Malisiewicz, T., Gupta, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126229 · Cited by 865
Segmentation as selective search for object recognition
van de Sande, K. E. A., Uijlings, J. R. R., Gevers, T., & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126456 · Cited by 739
Cited by
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684
Self-citationDeep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey
Liu, L., Ouyang, W., Wang, X., Fieguth, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., & Pietikäinen, M. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.02165 · Cited by 2,965
Region-based convolutional networks for accurate object detection and segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2437384 · Cited by 2,912
Self-citationDeep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey
Liu, L., Ouyang, W., Wang, X., Fieguth, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., & Pietikäinen, M. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 · Cited by 2,965
Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks
Zheng, S., Jayasumana, S., Romera-Paredes, B., Vineet, V., Su, Z., Du, D., Huang, C., & Torr, P. H. S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.179 · Cited by 2,386
“The first strategy is based on utilizing separated mechanisms for both feature extraction, and image segmentation exploiting the edges of the image [2, 20].”
BackgroundObject-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentation
Yuan, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, J. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58539-6_11 · Cited by 1,285
Multiscale Combinatorial Grouping
Arbelaez, P., Pont-Tuset, J., Barron, J., Marques, F., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.49 · Cited by 1,155
Self-citationSimultaneous Detection and Segmentation
Hariharan, B., Arbeláez, P., Girshick, R., & Malik, J. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10584-0_20 · Cited by 1,085
Self-citationTowards Automatic Concept-based Explanations
Ghorbani, A., Wexler, J., Zou, J., & Kim, B. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.03129 · Cited by 378
Crisp Boundary Detection Using Pointwise Mutual Information
Isola, P., Zoran, D., Krishnan, D., & Adelson, E. H. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_52 · Cited by 199
Iterative Instance Segmentation
Li, K., Hariharan, B., & Malik, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.398 · Cited by 152
Self-citationTowards Unified Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Dong, J., Chen, Q., Yan, S., & Yuille, A. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_20 · Cited by 70
Object-Proposal Evaluation Protocol is ‘Gameable’
Chavali, N., Agrawal, H., Mahendru, A., & Batra, D. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.97 · Cited by 65
Deep learning on sparse manifolds for faster object segmentation
Nascimento, J. C., & Carneiro, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2725582 · Cited by 17
Volumetric Semantic Segmentation Using Pyramid Context Features
Barron, J. T., Biggin, M. D., Arbelaez, P., Knowles, D. W., Keranen, S. V. E., & Malik, J. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2013.428 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Arbelaez, P., Hariharan, B., Gu, C., Gupta, S., Bourdev, L., & Malik, J.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 3378-3385
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115150266
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 28.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.