Cited by 309Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

End-to-End Instance Segmentation with Recurrent Attention

Open access
Ren, Mengye, Zemel, Richard S.·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

While convolutional neural networks have gained impressive success recently in solving structured prediction problems such as semantic segmentation, it remains a challenge to differentiate individual object instances in the scene. Instance segmentation is very important in a variety of applications, such as autonomous driving, image captioning, and visual question answering. Techniques that combine large graphical models with low-level vision have been proposed to address this problem, however, we propose an end-to-end recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture with an attention mechanism to model a human-like counting process, and produce detailed instance segmentations. The network is jointly trained to sequentially produce regions of interest as well as a dominant object segmentation within each region. The proposed model achieves competitive results on the CVPPP [27], KITTI [12], and Cityscapes [8] datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2017.39

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several object detectors used the bipartite matching loss.

    “Several object detectors [9,25,35] used the bipartite matching loss.”

    From End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers (2020) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ren, M., & Zemel, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
293-301
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962676885
Cited by
309
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Samsung
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (D16PC00003)
  • Interior Business Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
instance segmentation, recurrent neural networks, attention mechanism, end-to-end learning, object counting, region of interest detection, autonomous driving, visual question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review