Cited by 539Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsHuman Pose and Action Recognition

End-to-End People Detection in Crowded Scenes

Stewart, Russell, Andriluka, Mykhaylo, Ng, Andrew Y.·2016·2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Current people detectors operate either by scanning an image in a sliding window fashion or by classifying a discrete set of proposals. We propose a model that is based on decoding an image into a set of people detections. Our system takes an image as input and directly outputs a set of distinct detection hypotheses. Because we generate predictions jointly, common post-processing steps such as nonmaximum suppression are unnecessary. We use a recurrent LSTM layer for sequence generation and train our model end-to-end with a new loss function that operates on sets of detections. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on the challenging task of detecting people in crowded scenes1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2016.255

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using FPN as head detector, performance on Brainwash is much better than state-of-the-art in [23].

    “By using the FPN as the head detector, the performance is already much better than the state-ofart in [23].”

    From CrowdHuman: A Benchmark for Detecting Human in a Crowd (2018) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Closest to DETR are end-to-end set predictions for object detection and instance segmentation.

    “Closest to our approach are end-to-end set predictions for object detection [43] and instance segmentation [41,30,36,42].”

    From End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers (2020) · cites this paper as [42]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, R., Andriluka, M., & Ng, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE)
Venue
2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-06
Pages
2325-2333
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W607748843
Cited by
539
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 1
FWCI
18.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
human detection, crowded scenes, end-to-end detection, sequence generation, LSTM, joint detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review